Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug;89(8):971-5.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.060723.

An evaluation of the change in activity and workload arising from diabetic ophthalmology referrals following the introduction of a community based digital retinal photographic screening programme

Affiliations

An evaluation of the change in activity and workload arising from diabetic ophthalmology referrals following the introduction of a community based digital retinal photographic screening programme

P H Scanlon et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: To determine how the workload of an ophthalmology department changed following the introduction of an organised retinal screening programme.

Methods: Information was collected from the hospital medical record of people with diabetes attending eye clinics over 4 years. The first year was before screening, the next 2 years the first round, and the fourth year the second round.

Results: The total number of people with diabetes referred each year over the 4 year period was 853, 954, 974, 1051 consecutively. The number of people with diabetes in the county rose by 1400 per annum. The total number of referrals for an opinion about diabetic retinopathy was 227, 333, 363, 368, for cataract was 64, 57, 77, 93, and for glaucoma was 57, 62, 61, 68. The total number of patients referred for laser treatment over the 4 years was 77, 124, 111, and 63

Conclusion: This study suggests that the workload in the eye clinic increases in the first round of screening but in subsequent rounds it does not fall below the pre-screening level, except for laser treatment. This may be partly because of increasing numbers of people with diabetes. With the introduction of a national screening programme, this has significant workload implications for the National Health Service.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clifford R, PCCAG. An audit on the care of adult diabetic patients in Gloucestershire. Cheltenham: Gloucestershire Primary Care Clinical Audit Group (PCCAG), 1996, 1–54 (all).
    1. National Screening Committee. Preservation of sight in diabetes: a risk reduction programme: www.diabetic-retinopathy.screeening.nhs.uk 2000.
    1. Gillow JT, Gray JA. The National Screening Committee review of diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye 2001;15 (Pt 1) :1–2. - PubMed
    1. Garvican L, Clowes J, Gillow T. Preservation of sight in diabetes: developing a national risk reduction programme. Diabet Med 2000;17:627–34. - PubMed
    1. Scanlon PH, Malhotra R, Thomas G, et al. The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy. Diabet Med 2003;20:467–74. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources