Low utility of CYFRA 21-1 serum levels for diagnosis and follow-up in bladder cancer patients
- PMID: 16025482
- PMCID: PMC6808099
- DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20072
Low utility of CYFRA 21-1 serum levels for diagnosis and follow-up in bladder cancer patients
Abstract
We evaluated serum levels of soluble fragments of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21-1) by immunoassay (ES-700; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) to assess its usefulness in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder cancer. The study included 39 patients with a diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma (group 1) and 190 patients (group 2) with no evidence of tumor. In group 2, 180 patients had a history of bladder cancer, and 10 had benign prostatic hyperplasia. Significant differences in CYFRA 21-1 concentrations between groups 1 and 2 (P<0.01) were noted. However, CYFRA 21-1 levels did not significantly differ between the patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and those with bladder cancer (P=0.274). CYFRA 21-1 values were higher in invasive bladder cancer compared to that detected in superficial stages (P=0.011). Setting the optimal cutoff value at 2.5 ng/mL resulted in a sensitivity of 43.6% and a specificity of 82.1%. No statistical differences were found when we compared disease-free time among the 66 patients with recurrences (30.7 months with levels <2.5 ng/mL vs. 41.2 months with levels >2.5 ng/mL; P=0.248). The risk of recurrence in patients with levels lower than 2.5 ng/mL (0.79) was no different (P=0.097) from that found in patients with higher levels (1.69). CYFRA 21-1 serum levels do not provide enough sensitivity to justify its application in routine protocols for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer.
Similar articles
-
Cytokeratins as serum markers in egyptian bladder cancer. A comparison of CYFRA 21-1, TPA and TPS.Int J Biol Markers. 2001 Apr-Jun;16(2):130-5. doi: 10.1177/172460080101600208. Int J Biol Markers. 2001. PMID: 11471896
-
Urinary CYFRA 21.1 is not a useful marker for the detection of recurrences in the follow-up of superficial bladder cancer.Eur Urol. 2007 May;51(5):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.019. Epub 2006 Dec 18. Eur Urol. 2007. PMID: 17207912
-
Cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) in bladder cancer.Eur Urol. 1997;32(2):237-44. Eur Urol. 1997. PMID: 9286660
-
New electrochemiluminescent immunoassay for the determination of CYFRA 21-1: analytical evaluation and clinical diagnostic performance in urine samples of patients with bladder cancer.Clin Chem. 1999 Nov;45(11):1944-53. Clin Chem. 1999. PMID: 10545064 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential of Biomarkers CYFRA 21.1, ERCC1, p53, FGFR3 and TATI in Bladder Cancers.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 9;21(9):3360. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093360. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32397531 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Urine telomerase for diagnosis and surveillance of bladder cancer.Adv Urol. 2012;2012:693631. doi: 10.1155/2012/693631. Epub 2012 Jul 25. Adv Urol. 2012. PMID: 22888342 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Utility of Combining VI-RADS Scores and CYFRA 21-1 Levels in Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;32(8):415. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080415. Curr Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40862784 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Messing EM. Urothelial tumors of the urinary tract In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughn ED, et al., editors. Campbell's urology. 8th ed Philadelphia: W.B Saunders; 2002. p 2732–2773.
-
- Newling DW. Preventing recurrence and progression in superficial bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 1996;6:272–279.
-
- Badalament RA, Hemansen DK, Kimmel M, et al. The sensitivity of bladder cancer wash flow cytometry, bladder wash cytology, and voided cytology in the detection of bladder carcinoma. Cancer 1987;60:1423–1427. - PubMed
-
- Grossman HB. New methods for detection of bladder cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 1998;16:17–22. - PubMed
-
- Soloway MS. Do we have a prostate specific antigen for bladder cancer? J Urol 1999;161:447–448. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical