Selling organs and souls: should the state prohibit 'demeaning' practices?
- PMID: 16025595
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02448904
Selling organs and souls: should the state prohibit 'demeaning' practices?
Abstract
It is sometimes argued that practices such as organ-selling should be prohibited because they are demeaning to the individuals involved. In this article the plausibility of such an argument is questioned. I will examine what it means to demean or be demeaned, and suggest that the mere fact that an individual is demeaning themself does not provide sufficient justification for legal prohibition. On the contrary, such laws might be argued to be demeaning.
Similar articles
-
Commodification arguments for the legal prohibition of organ sale.Health Care Anal. 2000;8(2):189-201. doi: 10.1023/A:1009454612900. Health Care Anal. 2000. PMID: 11183446
-
Prostitutes, workers and kidneys: Brecher on the kidney trade.J Med Ethics. 1991 Jun;17(2):97-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.2.97. J Med Ethics. 1991. PMID: 1741843 Free PMC article.
-
Reconsidering Kantian arguments against organ selling.Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Mar;19(1):21-31. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9623-z. Med Health Care Philos. 2016. PMID: 25637083
-
The commodification of human reproductive materials.J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):388-93. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.388. J Med Ethics. 1998. PMID: 9873979 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nephrarious goings on. Kidney sales and moral arguments.J Med Philos. 1996 Aug;21(4):375-416. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.4.375. J Med Philos. 1996. PMID: 8899539 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources