The loved ones: families, intimates and patient autonomy
- PMID: 16025652
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121x.2003.tb00217.x
The loved ones: families, intimates and patient autonomy
Abstract
Patient autonomy is one of the central values in medical ethics. It is generally understood as recognition of patients' rights as free individuals answerable only to themselves. This emphasis on the individual leaves open the question of the position of the patients' 'loved ones', that is of families and significant others. The authors examine this question in three areas of law and medical ethics. Organ donation offers an example of preference given by medical ethics to family views, notwithstanding an expressed wish of the deceased to donate, and the legal position protecting such a request. Decisions concerning the treatment of incompetent patients illustrate consideration for the family in medical ethics, but hesitations in both law and ethics in accepting family views once expressed. And the tension between the interests of patients and family members over the access to genetic information usually results in respecting the patient's right to confidentiality. This individualistic perception of autonomy, as adopted by medical law, overlooks the patient's relationships with others and is too narrow to face the complexities of human lives.
Similar articles
-
Issues in biomedical ethics.Dis Mon. 1993 Dec;39(12):871-925. Dis Mon. 1993. PMID: 11643183 No abstract available.
-
Bioethics and the family: the cautionary view from family law.Utah Law Rev. 1992;1992(3):819-47. Utah Law Rev. 1992. PMID: 11656533 No abstract available.
-
Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.Fam Law Q. 1983 Spring;17(1):1-40. Fam Law Q. 1983. PMID: 11658459 No abstract available.
-
Deciding for others.Milbank Q. 1986;64(Suppl. 2):17-94. Milbank Q. 1986. PMID: 11649884 Review.
-
Individual and family consent to organ and tissue donation: is the current position coherent?J Med Ethics. 2005 Oct;31(10):587-90. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009654. J Med Ethics. 2005. PMID: 16199601 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Practice and challenges for organ donation after medical assistance in dying: A scoping review including the results of the first international roundtable in 2021.Am J Transplant. 2022 Dec;22(12):2759-2780. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17198. Epub 2022 Oct 26. Am J Transplant. 2022. PMID: 36100362 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Aug 8;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0207-8. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28789658 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond individualism: Is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research?Clin Ethics. 2017 Sep;12(3):150-165. doi: 10.1177/1477750917704156. Epub 2017 Apr 13. Clin Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28989327 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical