Analysis of antigenicity and immunogenicity of five different chemically defined constructs of a peptide

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the antigenicity and the immunogenicity of five constructs of a peptide, including the peptide in single copy, a tandem repeat containing three copies, a copolymer with glutaraldehyde and two constructs based on the MAP (Multiple Antigenic Peptide) model, one containing two copies (MAP-2) and the other, eight copies of the peptide (MAP-8). The peptide used in this test was the 115-131 sequence derived from the rSm28-GST antigen of Schistosoma mansoni. All constructs were recognized by rSm28-GST specific antibodies in solid phase immunoassays. However, the binding was higher when the MAP-8 was used as antigen at least partly because of its better coating on the microtiter plates. In vitro lymphoproliferative assays showed that polymer was mitogenic, repeat and MAP-2 did not stimulate rSm28-GST specific T cells while MAP-8 induced a slight response. The injection of MAP-8 to rats led to important antibody and T cell responses higher than those obtained with the other constructs. The IgG2a (cytotoxic antibody in schistosomiasis)/IgG2c (blocking antibody) ratio was independent of the immunogen. Taken together these results demonstrate that both the antigenicity and the immunogenicity of a peptide containing T and B cell epitope(s) are strongly related to the molecular form whereby it is presented and that the MAP-8 construct can be useful in serodiagnosis or in vaccination trials using synthetic peptides.