Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Summer;38(2):163-76.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.9-04.

Interaction of reinforcement schedules, a behavioral prosthesis, and work-related behavior in adults with mental retardation

Affiliations

Interaction of reinforcement schedules, a behavioral prosthesis, and work-related behavior in adults with mental retardation

Richard R Saunders et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Summer.

Abstract

The effects of variable-interval (VI) and fixed-ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement for work-related behavior and an organizer for the work materials (behavioral prosthesis) were evaluated with 3 adults with severe or profound mental retardation. The participants had been recommended for study because of high rates of off-task and aberrant behavior in their daily vocational training programs. For 2 participants, VI and FR schedules resulted in the same outcome: more aberrant behavior than on-task and off-task behavior combined. The FR schedule nearly eliminated emission of aberrant and off-task behavior by the 3rd participant. Combining the behavioral prosthesis with FR reinforcement (FR+O) increased the proportion of time spent in on-task behavior by all participants under certain FR schedule parameters. Second-by-second analyses of the observation records revealed that FR schedules reduced off-task and aberrant behavior during work sequences (i.e., ratio runs), and FR+O led to a further reduction of these behaviors during postreinforcement pauses. Overall, the results show how organizer and schedule parameters can be adjusted to produce an optimized balance between productivity and reinforcement while undesirable behavior is minimized.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Percentage of each experimental session on task for each participant.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Median duration of the work sequences and PRPs for each condition for each participant.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Median proportion of work sequences and PRPs allocated to aberrant and off-task behavior combined for each participant from the condition-change criterion sessions of one example condition of each reinforcement schedule type.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Association on Mental Retardation. Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support. Washington, DC: Author; 1992.
    1. Azrin N.H, Kaplin S.J, Foxx R.M. Autism reversal: Eliminating stereotypic self-stimulation of retarded individuals. American Journal of Mental Deficiency. 1973;78:241–248. - PubMed
    1. Barmann B.C. Use of contingent vibration in the treatment of self-stimulatory hand-mouthing and ruminative vomiting behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 1980;11:307–311.
    1. Barrett B.H. Behavior analysis. In: Wortis J, editor. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Oxford, England: Brunner Mazel; 1977. pp. 141–202. Vol. 9.
    1. Cataldo M.F, Ward E.M, Russo D.C, Riordan M, Bennett D. Compliance and correlated problem behavior in children: Effects of contingent and noncontingent reinforcement. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities. 1986;6:265–282.

Publication types