Reception class predictors of literacy skills
- PMID: 16033661
- DOI: 10.1348/000709904X24780
Reception class predictors of literacy skills
Abstract
Background: In the last decade, there has been a growing interest, both in the UK and abroad, in developing early screening tests for dyslexia that can be used with very young children. In addition to measures of literacy achievement, such screening tests typically aim to identify underlying difficulties, such as phonological deficits, that might hinder a child's educational progress. The Dyslexia Early Screening Test (DEST; Nicolson & Fawcett, 1996) is an example of such a test that combines attainment and diagnostic indicators.
Aim: The study reported assessed the ability of the DEST to predict future literacy skills in contrast with the prediction afforded by school-based measures, such as letter knowledge.
Sample: Participants were 45 boys attending a reception class, with a mean age of 4.87 years at the start of the study and 6.63 years at the end.
Methods: Measures of literacy skills, phonological awareness, verbal memory, motor skill, and auditory processing were assessed using the DEST as the initial screening tool at Phase 1. Measures of letter knowledge, non-word reading, and rhyme judgment were taken at Phase 2. Phase 3 measures, 14 months after the start of the study, comprised single-word reading and spelling. At Phase 4, some 22 months after the beginning of the study, measures of reading and spelling ability were assessed again.
Results: Individual subtests of the DEST were more predictive of later literacy skills than the global screening test's score (the 'at risk quotient'). Better predictors were the DEST subtest of sound order and rapid automatized naming, together with the school attainment measure of letter knowledge.
Conclusions: Although some DEST subtests did offer predictors of future literacy skills, school-based measures of letter knowledge may be equally valid as assessment measures. Additionally, the results question the usefulness of combining measures to form an 'at risk' index of future literacy difficulties, particularly in the age range assessed.
Similar articles
-
Predicting curriculum and test performance at age 11 years from pupil background, baseline skills and phonological awareness at age 5 years.J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;48(7):732-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01746.x. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17593154
-
Predictors of word-level literacy amongst Grade 3 children in five diverse languages.Dyslexia. 2008 Aug;14(3):170-87. doi: 10.1002/dys.369. Dyslexia. 2008. PMID: 18697190
-
Kindergarten letter knowledge, phonological skills, and memory processes: relative effects on early literacy.J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Jun;62(1):30-59. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0021. J Exp Child Psychol. 1996. PMID: 8683184
-
Evaluation of children with reading difficulties.Am Fam Physician. 2006 Dec 15;74(12):2079-84. Am Fam Physician. 2006. PMID: 17186715 Review.
-
Specific disorders and broader phenotypes: the case of dyslexia.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jan;61(1):142-56. doi: 10.1080/17470210701508830. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008. PMID: 18038345 Review.
Cited by
-
Predicting dyslexia using prereading skills: the role of sensorimotor and cognitive abilities.J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;57(6):750-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12488. Epub 2015 Dec 12. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 26662375 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid serial naming and reading ability: the role of lexical access.Read Writ. 2011 Jan;24(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9199-1. Read Writ. 2011. PMID: 22215934 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources