Religion's evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion
- PMID: 16035401
- DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x04000172
Religion's evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion
Abstract
Religion is not an evolutionary adaptation per se, but a recurring cultural by-product of the complex evolutionary landscape that sets cognitive, emotional, and material conditions for ordinary human interactions. Religion exploits only ordinary cognitive processes to passionately display costly devotion to counterintuitive worlds governed by supernatural agents. The conceptual foundations of religion are intuitively given by task-specific panhuman cognitive domains, including folkmechanics, folkbiology, and folkpsychology. Core religious beliefs minimally violate ordinary notions about how the world is, with all of its inescapable problems, thus enabling people to imagine minimally impossible supernatural worlds that solve existential problems, including death and deception. Here the focus is on folkpsychology and agency. A key feature of the supernatural agent concepts common to all religions is the triggering of an "Innate Releasing Mechanism," or "agency detector," whose proper (naturally selected) domain encompasses animate objects relevant to hominid survival--such as predators, protectors, and prey--but which actually extends to moving dots on computer screens, voices in wind, and faces on clouds. Folkpsychology also crucially involves metarepresentation, which makes deception possible and threatens any social order. However, these same metacognitive capacities provide the hope and promise of open-ended solutions through representations of counterfactual supernatural worlds that cannot be logically or empirically verified or falsified. Because religious beliefs cannot be deductively or inductively validated, validation occurs only by ritually addressing the very emotions motivating religion. Cross-cultural experimental evidence encourages these claims.
Similar articles
-
A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):84-94. doi: 10.1177/1088868309351165. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010. PMID: 19940284
-
Theodiversity.Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:465-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033426. Epub 2015 Sep 17. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26393871 Review.
-
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions.Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14001356. Epub 2014 Dec 2. Behav Brain Sci. 2016. PMID: 26785995
-
Variation in the anthropomorphization of supernatural beings and its implications for cognitive theories of religion.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Sep;34(5):1123-38. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1123. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008. PMID: 18763896
-
The supernatural characters and powers of sacred trees in the Holy Land.J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Feb 25;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-3-10. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007. PMID: 17319970 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Hunter-Gatherers and the Origins of Religion.Hum Nat. 2016 Sep;27(3):261-82. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9260-0. Hum Nat. 2016. PMID: 27154194 Free PMC article.
-
What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0254626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254626. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34252167 Free PMC article.
-
The God Allusion : Individual Variation in Agency Detection, Mentalizing and Schizotypy and Their Association with Religious Beliefs and Behaviors.Hum Nat. 2016 Jun;27(2):160-72. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9256-9. Hum Nat. 2016. PMID: 27023357
-
Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends.Hum Nat. 2005 Dec;16(4):360-81. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1015-2. Hum Nat. 2005. PMID: 26189837
-
Testing major evolutionary hypotheses about religion with a random sample.Hum Nat. 2005 Dec;16(4):382-409. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1016-1. Hum Nat. 2005. PMID: 26189838