Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics
- PMID: 16036688
- PMCID: PMC1506750
- DOI: 10.1080/15265160590923358
Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics
Abstract
From a twenty-first century partnership between bioethics and neuroscience, the modern field of neuroethics is emerging, and technologies enabling functional neuroimaging with unprecedented sensitivity have brought new ethical, social and legal issues to the forefront. Some issues, akin to those surrounding modern genetics, raise critical questions regarding prediction of disease, privacy and identity. However, with new and still-evolving insights into our neurobiology and previously unquantifiable features of profoundly personal behaviors such as social attitude, value and moral agency, the difficulty of carefully and properly interpreting the relationship between brain findings and our own self-concept is unprecedented. Therefore, while the ethics of genetics provides a legitimate starting point--even a backbone--for tackling ethical issues in neuroimaging, they do not suffice. Drawing on recent neuroimaging findings and their plausible real-world applications, we argue that interpretation of neuroimaging data is a key epistemological and ethical challenge. This challenge is two-fold. First, at the scientific level, the sheer complexity of neuroscience research poses challenges for integration of knowledge and meaningful interpretation of data. Second, at the social and cultural level, we find that interpretations of imaging studies are bound by cultural and anthropological frameworks. In particular, the introduction of concepts of self and personhood in neuroimaging illustrates the interaction of interpretation levels and is a major reason why ethical reflection on genetics will only partially help settle neuroethical issues. Indeed, ethical interpretation of such findings will necessitate not only traditional bioethical input but also a wider perspective on the construction of scientific knowledge.
Figures
Comment in
-
Neuroimaging: revolutionary research tool or a post-modern phrenology?Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):19; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590969060. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036689 No abstract available.
-
On the proliferation of bioethics sub-disciplines: do we really need "genethics" and "neuroethics"?Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):20-1; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960924. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036690 No abstract available.
-
Brains, genes, and the making of the self.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):21-3; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960401. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036691 No abstract available.
-
Caution in leaping from functional imaging to functional neurosurgery.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):23-5; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960311. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036692 No abstract available.
-
Framing neuroethics: a sociological assessment of the neuroethical imagination.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):25-7; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960267. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036693 No abstract available.
-
Finding the right compass for issue-mapping in neuroimaging.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):27-9; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960285. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036694 No abstract available.
-
Imagining a neuroethics which would go further than genethics.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):29-31; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960276. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036695 No abstract available.
-
Neuroethics: a philosophical challenge.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):31-3; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960302. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036696 No abstract available.
-
Neuroethics, new ethics?Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):33; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960393. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036697 No abstract available.
-
Neuroscience and metaphysics.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):34-6; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960258. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036698 No abstract available.
-
Neuro exceptionalism?Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):36-8; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960410. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036699 No abstract available.
-
It's time to go public with neuroethics.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Mar-Apr;5(2):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160590970419. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16680883 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[What happens in the brain of my patients? Neuroimaging and neurogenetics as ethical challenges in medicine].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Dec;132(49):2646-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993114. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007. PMID: 18050032 Review. German.
-
Brains, genes, and the making of the self.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):21-3; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960401. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036691 No abstract available.
-
Framing neuroethics: a sociological assessment of the neuroethical imagination.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):25-7; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960267. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036693 No abstract available.
-
Ethical issues in neuroscience.Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;19(6):600-7. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000245752.75879.26. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006. PMID: 17012939 Review.
-
Neuroethics: a philosophical challenge.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring;5(2):31-3; discussion W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160590960302. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036696 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
AI ethics in computational psychiatry: From the neuroscience of consciousness to the ethics of consciousness.Behav Brain Res. 2022 Feb 26;420:113704. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113704. Epub 2021 Dec 4. Behav Brain Res. 2022. PMID: 34871706 Free PMC article.
-
Neurorights in the Constitution: from neurotechnology to ethics and politics.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Dec 2;379(1915):20230098. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0098. Epub 2024 Oct 21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39428886 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Involuntary emotional expressive disorder: a case for a deeper neuroethics.Neurotherapeutics. 2007 Jul;4(3):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.03.003. Neurotherapeutics. 2007. PMID: 17599723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neuroethics beyond genethics. Despite the overlap between the ethics of neuroscience and genetics, there are important areas where the two diverge.EMBO Rep. 2007 Jul;8 Spec No(Suppl 1):S52-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401009. EMBO Rep. 2007. PMID: 17726445 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Does it make sense to speak of neuroethics? Three problems with keying ethics to hot new science and technology.EMBO Rep. 2007 Jul;8 Spec No(Suppl 1):S61-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400992. EMBO Rep. 2007. PMID: 17726447 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ake v. Oklahoma. 1985. 470 U.S. 68.
-
- Anderson MC, Ochsner KN, Kuhls B, Cooper J, Robertson E, Gabrieli SW, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE. Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science. 2004;303(5655):232–235. - PubMed
-
- Angier N. Why we're so nice: We're wired to cooperate. New York Times. 2002;1
-
- Beaulieu A. Images are not the (only) truth: Brain mapping, visual knowledge and iconoclasm. Science, Technology and Human Values. 2002;27:53–87.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources