Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Spring;5(2):5-18.
doi: 10.1080/15265160590923358.

Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics

Affiliations

Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics

Judy Illes et al. Am J Bioeth. 2005 Spring.

Abstract

From a twenty-first century partnership between bioethics and neuroscience, the modern field of neuroethics is emerging, and technologies enabling functional neuroimaging with unprecedented sensitivity have brought new ethical, social and legal issues to the forefront. Some issues, akin to those surrounding modern genetics, raise critical questions regarding prediction of disease, privacy and identity. However, with new and still-evolving insights into our neurobiology and previously unquantifiable features of profoundly personal behaviors such as social attitude, value and moral agency, the difficulty of carefully and properly interpreting the relationship between brain findings and our own self-concept is unprecedented. Therefore, while the ethics of genetics provides a legitimate starting point--even a backbone--for tackling ethical issues in neuroimaging, they do not suffice. Drawing on recent neuroimaging findings and their plausible real-world applications, we argue that interpretation of neuroimaging data is a key epistemological and ethical challenge. This challenge is two-fold. First, at the scientific level, the sheer complexity of neuroscience research poses challenges for integration of knowledge and meaningful interpretation of data. Second, at the social and cultural level, we find that interpretations of imaging studies are bound by cultural and anthropological frameworks. In particular, the introduction of concepts of self and personhood in neuroimaging illustrates the interaction of interpretation levels and is a major reason why ethical reflection on genetics will only partially help settle neuroethical issues. Indeed, ethical interpretation of such findings will necessitate not only traditional bioethical input but also a wider perspective on the construction of scientific knowledge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental (“B” state) images are subtracted from control (“A” state) images to achieve regional activation maps with fMRI. (Courtesy of Gary H. Glover, Lucas MRS/MRI Center, Stanford University)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ake v. Oklahoma. 1985. 470 U.S. 68.
    1. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio A. Fear and the Human Amygdala. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1995;5:5879–5892. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson MC, Ochsner KN, Kuhls B, Cooper J, Robertson E, Gabrieli SW, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE. Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science. 2004;303(5655):232–235. - PubMed
    1. Angier N. Why we're so nice: We're wired to cooperate. New York Times. 2002;1
    1. Beaulieu A. Images are not the (only) truth: Brain mapping, visual knowledge and iconoclasm. Science, Technology and Human Values. 2002;27:53–87.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources