Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Aug;101(2):566-572.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000157121.71808.04.

The short-lasting analgesia and long-term antihyperalgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine in patients undergoing colonic surgery

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The short-lasting analgesia and long-term antihyperalgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine in patients undergoing colonic surgery

Marc De Kock et al. Anesth Analg. 2005 Aug.

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the antihyperalgesic effect of clonidine after surgery. Sixty patients undergoing right colic resection were studied. Patients were randomized to receive prior to general anesthesia a 2-mL intrathecal (IT) injection of 300 microg of clonidine or saline, or 10 mg of bupivacaine. General anesthesia was achieved using a target concentration propofol infusion and monitored using bispectral index. Postoperative analgesia was provided by morphine IV given through a patient-controlled analgesia device. Postoperative analgesia was assessed by morphine requirements and visual analog scale pain scores at rest, cough, and movement during the first 72 h. Mechanical hyperalgesia was measured by von Frey filaments. Patients were questioned regarding residual pain at 2 wk,1, 6, and 12 mo. The patient-controlled analgesia morphine requirements were significantly smaller in the IT clonidine group (31.5 +/- 12 versus 91 +/- 25.5 and 43 +/- 15 mg, respectively, in groups clonidine, saline, and bupivacaine: P < 0.05 at 72 postoperative hours). The area of hyperalgesia at 72 h was 3 +/- 5 cm(2) in the clonidine group versus 90 +/- 30 and 35 +/- 20 cm(2) in the saline and bupivacaine groups (P < 0.05). At 6 mo, fewer patients in the clonidine group experienced residual pain than in the saline group (0 of 20 versus 6 of 20, P < 0.05). We conclude that both intraoperative spinal clonidine and bupivacaine improve immediate postoperative analgesia. IT clonidine was, however, more potent than IT bupivacaine to reduce postoperative secondary hyperalgesia.

Implications: Spinal clonidine contributes to the reduction of secondary hyperalgesia in patients recovering from abdominal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Perkins F, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery: a review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1123–33.
    1. De Kock M, Lavand’homme P, Waterloos H. “Balanced analgesia” in the perioperative period: is there a place for ketamine? Pain 2001;92:373–80.
    1. Eisenach J, De Kock M, Klimscha W. α2-Adrenergic agonists for regional anesthesia: a clinical review of clonidine (1984–1995). Anesthesiology 1996;85:655–74.
    1. De Kock M, Crochet B, Morimont C, Scholtes JL. Epidural or intravenous clonidine for intra and postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 1993;79:525–33.
    1. Onttonen T, Pertovaara A. The mechanical antihyperalgesic effect of intrathecally administered MPV-246, a novel α2-adrenoceptor agonist, in a rat model of postoperative pain. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1740–5.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources