Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jul 28;11(28):4291-9.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i28.4291.

Treatment of uncomplicated reflux disease

Affiliations
Review

Treatment of uncomplicated reflux disease

Joachim Labenz et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Uncomplicated reflux disease comprises the non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD). The objectives of treatment are the adequate control of symptoms with restoration of quality of life, healing of lesions and prevention of relapse. Treatment of NERD consists in the administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for 2-4 wk, although patients with NERD show an overall poorer response to PPI treatment than patients with ERD owing to the fact that patients with NERD do not form a pathophysiologically homogenous group. For long-term management on-demand treatment with a PPI is probably the best option. In patients with ERD, therapy with a standard dose PPI for 4-8 wk is always recommended. Long-term treatment of ERD is applied either intermittently or as continuous maintenance treatment with an attempt to reduce the daily dosage of the PPI (step-down principle). In selected patients requiring long-term PPI treatment, antireflux surgery is an alternative option. In patients with troublesome reflux symptoms and without alarming features empirical PPI therapy is another option for initial management. Therapy should be withdrawn after initial success. In the case of relapse, the long-term care depends on a careful risk assessment and the response to PPI therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GERD-a categorical disease with three distinct entities[2,3].
Figure 2
Figure 2
No correlation between endoscopic findings and symptom severity in patients with GERD[9].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Initial management of patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Initial therapy and long-term care of patients with NERD.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Management of patients with mild to moderate erosive esophagitis (A) and moderate to severe esophagitis (B)[4,5].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Proposal for the empirical management of patients with uninvestigated GERD[88].

References

    1. Locke GR, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1448–1456. - PubMed
    1. Quigley EM. Non-erosive reflux disease: part of the spectrum of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, a component of functional dyspepsia, or both? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13 Suppl 1:S13–S18. - PubMed
    1. Fass R, Ofman JJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease--should we adopt a new conceptual framework? Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1901–1909. - PubMed
    1. Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, Fennerty MB, Janssens J, Kahrilas PJ, Lauritsen K, Reynolds JC, Shaw N, Talley NJ. An evi-dence-based appraisal of reflux disease management – the Genval Workshop Report. Gut. 1999;44(Suppl 2):S1–S16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dent J. Management of reflux disease. Gut. 2002;50 Suppl 4:iv67–iv71. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms