Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005;10(4):563-73.

Impact of newly available drugs on clinical progression in patients with virological failure after exposure to three classes of antiretrovirals

Affiliations
  • PMID: 16038483

Impact of newly available drugs on clinical progression in patients with virological failure after exposure to three classes of antiretrovirals

Dominique Costagliola et al. Antivir Ther. 2005.

Abstract

Objective: To study the prognosis of HIV-infected patients with virological failure after exposure to three classes of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs).

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: French Hospital Database on HIV.

Patients: Patients previously exposed to at least two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), two protease inhibitors and one non-NRTI, with viral load (/L) values of > 5000 copies/ml after the exposure criteria were met and a new treatment initiated between 1998 and 2001 with VL > 5000 copies/ml.

Main outcome measures: Risk of new AIDS-defining-events (ADEs) or death from first introduction of a drug never used before occurring between 1998 and 2001 defined as baseline.

Results: The main baseline characteristics of the 1092 patients were: previous ADE in 49% of cases, median CD4 cell count 181 microl, median VL 4.9 log10 copies/ml, median duration of ARV therapy 5.0 years and previous exposure to a median of nine ARVs. The crude progression rates were 20.1/100 patient-years among patients included in 1998, 15.1 in 1999, 11.1 in 2000 and 8.6 in 2001. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the calendar year of inclusion was associated with the risk of clinical progression (P < 0.001). When the types of newly available drugs used at baseline or during follow-up were introduced into the model, year of inclusion was no longer associated with the risk of clinical progression (P = 0.42), while exposure to amprenavir/r, lopinavir/r, abacavir or tenofovir was associated with a lower risk.

Conclusions: The clinical prognosis of heavily pretreated patients experiencing virological failure improved between 1998 and 2001, mainly thanks to the use of newly available drugs with more favourable resistance profiles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances