Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness
- PMID: 16041214
- PMCID: PMC1357729
- DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness
Abstract
Objective: We sought to determine the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on the management of presumed resectable pancreatic cancer and to assess the cost of this new staging procedure.
Summary background data: PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used for the staging of pancreatic cancer, but anatomic information is limited. Integrated PET/CT enables optimal anatomic delineation of PET findings and identification of FDG-negative lesions on computed tomography (CT) images and might improve preoperative staging.
Material and methods: Patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who had a PET/CT between June 2001 to April 2004 were entered into a prospective database. Routine staging included abdominal CT, chest x-ray, and CA 19-9 measurement. FDG-PET/CT was conducted according to a standardized protocol, and findings were confirmed by histology. Cost benefit analysis was performed based on charged cost of PET/CT and pancreatic resection and included the time frame of staging and surgery.
Results: Fifty-nine patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 40-80 years) were included in this analysis. Fifty-one patients had lesions in the head and 8 in the tail of the pancreas. The positive and negative predictive values for pancreatic cancer were 91% and 64%, respectively. PET/CT detected additional distant metastases in 5 and synchronous rectal cancer in 2 patients. PET/CT findings changed the management in 16% of patients with pancreatic cancer deemed resectable after routine staging (P = 0.031) and was cost saving.
Conclusions: PET/CT represents an important staging procedure prior to pancreatic resection for cancer, since it significantly improves patient selection and is cost-effective.
Figures
Comment in
-
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness.Ann Surg. 2006 May;243(5):709-10; author reply 710. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000216766.93589.34. Ann Surg. 2006. PMID: 16633011 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons evidence based reviews in surgery. 22. The use of PET/CT scanning on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer.Can J Surg. 2007 Oct;50(5):400-2. Can J Surg. 2007. PMID: 18031643 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P GLOBOCAN 2000: cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. In: IARC, ed. Cancer Base No. 5. Lyon: IARC; 2001.
-
- Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, et al. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2004;363:1049–1057. - PubMed
-
- Raut C, Grau A, Staerkel G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:118–128. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
