Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May;14(4):1087-98.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-3305-2.

Health state preference scores of children with spina bifida and their caregivers

Affiliations

Health state preference scores of children with spina bifida and their caregivers

John M Tilford et al. Qual Life Res. 2005 May.

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions to prevent or treat spina bifida require quality of life information measured as preference scores. Preference scores of caregivers also may be relevant. This study tested whether the preference scores of children with spina bifida and their caregivers would decrease as disability in the child increased. Families of children aged 0-17 with spina bifida (N = 98) were identified using a birth defect surveillance system in the state of Arkansas. Primary caregivers of children with spina bifida identified other families with an unaffected child (N = 49). Preference scores for child health states were determined using the Health Utilities Index--Mark 2 (HUI2). Caregiver preference scores were determined using the Quality of Well-Being (QWB) scale. Children with spina bifida were categorized into three disability levels according to the location of the child's lesion. Mean preference scores declined for both affected children and the primary caregiver as disability in the child increased. In multivariate analysis, the preference score of the child was a significant and positive predictor of the primary caregiver's preference score. A more modest association was found for caregiver health preference scores by lesion location. The findings can inform cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions to treat or prevent spina bifida.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Affect Disord. 2003 Sep;76(1-3):237-47 - PubMed
    1. Teratology. 2001;64 Suppl 1:S37-41 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 2001 May;39(5):413-24 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1986 Oct;81(4):565-78 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):290-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources