Clinical experience and acceptability of the etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implant
- PMID: 16043175
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.06.007
Clinical experience and acceptability of the etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implant
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate efficacy, adverse effects, and user continuation rate of an etonogestrel subdermal single-rod contraceptive implant.
Methods: A total of 417 healthy volunteers of childbearing age were included in this multicenter trial. After implant insertion, the women were followed up during the 3 years of contraceptive action. At each visit, clinical findings, side effects, and bleeding patterns were recorded. Efficacy and continuation rates were analyzed using the Pearl Index and Kaplan-Meier life tables, respectively.
Results: The observation period totaled 958.5 woman-years (27.5 months per woman). The Pearl Index score was 0. Side effects were reported by 44.4% of users, but the proportion had decreased to 16.5% by the end of the study. The continuation rate was 61.4%. The most common reason for early discontinuation (in 21.1% of the participants) was menstrual disturbances.
Conclusions: Etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implants demonstrated high efficacy and an acceptable continuation rate. Counseling potential users explicitly about the side effects will optimize patient success with this long-acting contraceptive.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel.Contraception. 2005 May;71(5):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.11.007. Contraception. 2005. PMID: 15854630 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety, efficacy and acceptability of implanon a single rod implantable contraceptive (etonogestrel) in University of Benin Teaching Hospital.Niger J Clin Pract. 2010 Sep;13(3):331-5. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 20857796
-
Prolonged use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device: 2 years beyond Food and Drug Administration-approved duration.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):586.e1-586.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.036. Epub 2017 Jan 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28147241 Free PMC article.
-
Etonogestrel implant (Implanon) for contraception.Drug Ther Bull. 2001 Aug;39(8):57-9. Drug Ther Bull. 2001. PMID: 11526801 Review.
-
In brief: etonogestrel (nexplanon) contraceptive implant.Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2012 Feb 6;54(1383):12. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2012. PMID: 22354222 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009 Nov 3;3:205-11. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s4299. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009. PMID: 19936163 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant.Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 6;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01054-y. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33407632 Free PMC article.
-
An Observational Study on the Application of the Second-generation Radiopaque Subcutaneous Implant.Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Summer;20(3):132-139. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.114527.14892. Iran J Pharm Res. 2021. PMID: 34903976 Free PMC article.
-
Contraceptive failure in the United States.Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Mar 12. Contraception. 2011. PMID: 21477680 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1105-1113. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821188ad. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21508749 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources