Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Sep;61(3):315-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0287-1. Epub 2005 Jul 21.

Codon bias and noncoding GC content correlate negatively with recombination rate on the Drosophila X chromosome

Affiliations

Codon bias and noncoding GC content correlate negatively with recombination rate on the Drosophila X chromosome

Nadia D Singh et al. J Mol Evol. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

The patterns and processes of molecular evolution may differ between the X chromosome and the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. This may in part be due to differences in the effective population size between the two chromosome sets and in part to the hemizygosity of the X chromosome in Drosophila males. These and other factors may lead to differences both in the gene complements of the X and the autosomes and in the properties of the genes residing on those chromosomes. Here we show that codon bias and recombination rate are correlated strongly and negatively on the X chromosome, and that this correlation cannot be explained by indirect relationships with other known determinants of codon bias. This is in dramatic contrast to the weak positive correlation found on the autosomes. We explored possible explanations for these patterns, which required a comprehensive analysis of the relationships among multiple genetic properties such as protein length and expression level. This analysis highlights conserved features of coding sequence evolution on the X and the autosomes and illuminates interesting differences between these two chromosome sets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Dec;8(6):688-93 - PubMed
    1. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269-94 - PubMed
    1. Science. 2003 Jan 31;299(5607):697-700 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1007-11 - PubMed
    1. Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Feb;21(2):286-94 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources