[Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry]
- PMID: 16044280
- DOI: 10.1007/s00347-005-1212-8
[Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry]
Abstract
Evaluation of visual field findings is an essential ophthalmological task. Applying psychophysical principles enables noninvasive (topo-)diagnosis in cases of unexplained visual loss or suspected lesions of the visual pathway. Furthermore, any kind of expert opinion or ability test critically depends on adequate visual field findings. Repeated examinations allow functional follow-up of a disease and assessment of therapeutic efficiency. This paper explicitly focuses on conventional strategies since these are widespread, easily accessible, standardized, and well established in everyday practice over years. Standardized white-on-white perimetry with moving targets (kinetic perimetry) is the major topic of this paper (part 2) in addition to "rough"/preliminary confrontation visual field testing. This review series is aimed at imparting basic concepts in perimetry and psychophysics to ophthalmologists and also addresses interested physicians from other disciplines.
Similar articles
-
[Conventional perimetry. Part 3: Static perimetry: grid--strategy--visualisation].Ophthalmologe. 2006 Feb;103(2):149-63; quiz 164-5. doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1301-8. Ophthalmologe. 2006. PMID: 16437233 Review. German.
-
[Conventional perimetry I: introduction--basics].Ophthalmologe. 2005 Jun;102(6):627-44; quiz 645-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1189-3. Ophthalmologe. 2005. PMID: 15906041 Review. German.
-
[Conventional techniques of visual field examination: part 4 Static perimetry: interpretation--perimetric indices--follow-up--perimetry in childhood].Ophthalmologe. 2006 Mar;103(3):235-54. quiz 255-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1304-5. Ophthalmologe. 2006. PMID: 16496107 Review. German.
-
Accuracy of kinetic perimetry assessment with the Humphrey 850; an exploratory comparative study.Eye (Lond). 2019 Dec;33(12):1952-1960. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0520-1. Epub 2019 Jul 22. Eye (Lond). 2019. PMID: 31332292 Free PMC article.
-
[Perimetry in Neuro-ophthalmological Function Diagnostics: Indication - Methods - Topodiagnostic Aspects].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2018 Nov;235(11):1218-1228. doi: 10.1055/a-0668-5971. Epub 2018 Oct 16. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2018. PMID: 30326540 Review. German.
Cited by
-
[Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].Ophthalmologe. 2012 Apr;109(4):325-36. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2543-x. Ophthalmologe. 2012. PMID: 22527729 German.
-
Normal Values for the Full Visual Field, Corrected for Age- and Reaction Time, Using Semiautomated Kinetic Testing on the Octopus 900 Perimeter.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 4;5(2):5. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.5. eCollection 2016 Mar. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 26966641 Free PMC article.
-
[Functional glaucoma diagnosis].Ophthalmologe. 2009 Apr;106(4):375-85; quiz 386. doi: 10.1007/s00347-008-1817-9. Ophthalmologe. 2009. PMID: 19343353 Review. German.
-
[Recommendations for a standardized perimetry within the framework of epilepsy surgery].Ophthalmologe. 2011 Jul;108(7):628-36. doi: 10.1007/s00347-011-2390-1. Ophthalmologe. 2011. PMID: 21717226 Review. German.
-
[Conventional perimetry. Part 3: Static perimetry: grid--strategy--visualisation].Ophthalmologe. 2006 Feb;103(2):149-63; quiz 164-5. doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1301-8. Ophthalmologe. 2006. PMID: 16437233 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources