Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study
- PMID: 16044612
Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study
Abstract
The case of Reibl v. Hughes has significantly altered the law regarding informed consent in Canada. It might be expected, therefore, that its impact on the Canadian medical profession would be significant. However, in the first study to examine the practice of Canadian doctors in this respect, Professor Robertson concludes that the profession is largely unaware of either the decision or its importance. Further, the study examines doctors' current perceptions and opinions on the disclosure of risks to patients and the results, among others, raise serious questions regarding both the awareness and reception of important legal rulings.
Similar articles
-
Informed consent ten years later: the impact of Reibl v. Hughes.Can Bar Rev. 1991 Sep;70(3):423-47. Can Bar Rev. 1991. PMID: 12211262
-
[The origin of informed consent].Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005. PMID: 16602332 Italian.
-
Awareness, knowledge and attitude toward informed consent among doctors in two different cultures in Asia: a cross-sectional comparative study in Malaysia and Kashmir, India.Singapore Med J. 2007 Jun;48(6):559-65. Singapore Med J. 2007. PMID: 17538757
-
Leaving Laputa: what doctors aren't taught about informed consent.J Clin Ethics. 2000 Spring;11(1):3-13. J Clin Ethics. 2000. PMID: 10904885 Review. No abstract available.
-
On failing to understand informed consent.Br J Hosp Med. 1994 Sep 7-20;52(5):235-8. Br J Hosp Med. 1994. PMID: 7820322 Review.
Cited by
-
Legal obligation of physicians to disclose information to patients.CMAJ. 1991 Mar 15;144(6):681-5. CMAJ. 1991. PMID: 1998927 Free PMC article.