Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):267-70.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7511.267.

Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials

Sanaa Al-Marzouki  1 , Stephen Evans, Tom Marshall, Ian Roberts
Affiliations

Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials

Sanaa Al-Marzouki et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To test the application of statistical methods to detect data fabrication in a clinical trial.

Setting: Data from two clinical trials: a trial of a dietary intervention for cardiovascular disease and a trial of a drug intervention for the same problem.

Outcome measures: Baseline comparisons of means and variances of cardiovascular risk factors; digit preference overall and its pattern by group.

Results: In the dietary intervention trial, variances for 16 of the 22 variables available at baseline were significantly different, and 10 significant differences were seen in means for these variables. Some of these P values were extraordinarily small. Distributions of the final recorded digit were significantly different between the intervention and the control group at baseline for 14/22 variables in the dietary trial. In the drug trial, only five variables were available, and no significant differences between the groups for baseline values in means or variances or digit preference were seen.

Conclusions: Several statistical features of the data from the dietary trial are so strongly suggestive of data fabrication that no other explanation is likely.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1994: 386-401.
    1. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991: 122-143.
    1. Buyse M, George SL, Evans S, Geller NL, Ranstam J, Scherrer B, et al. The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials. Stat Med 1999;18: 3435-51. - PubMed
    1. Taylor RN, McEntegart DJ, Stillman EC. Statistical techniques to detect fraud and other data irregularities in clinical questionnaire data. Drug Inform J 2002;36: 115-25.
    1. Evans S. Statistical aspects of the detection of fraud. In: Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M, eds. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. 3rd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001: 186-204.

MeSH terms