Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug 7;11(29):4552-9.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i29.4552.

Clinical analysis of surgical treatment of portal hypertension

Affiliations

Clinical analysis of surgical treatment of portal hypertension

Xin-Bao Xu et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To review the experience in surgery for 508 patients with portal hypertension and to explore the selection of reasonable operation under different conditions.

Methods: The data of 508 patients with portal hypertension treated surgically in 1991-2001 in our centers were analyzed. Of the 508 patients, 256 were treated with portaazygous devascularization (PAD), 167 with portasystemic shunt (PSS), 62 with selective shunt (SS), 11 with combined portasystemic shunt and portaazygous devascularization (PSS+PAD), 9 with liver transplantation (LT), 3 with union operation for hepatic carcinoma and portal hypertension (HCC+PH).

Results: In the 167 patients treated with PSS, free portal pressure (FPP) was significantly higher in the patients with a longer diameter of the anastomotic stoma than in those with a shorter diameter before the operation (P < 0.01). After the operation, FPP in the former patients markedly decreased compared to the latter ones (P < 0.01). The incidence rate of hemorrhage in patients treated with PAD, PSS, SS, PSS+PAD, and HCC+PH was 21.09% (54/256), 13.77 (23/167), 11.29 (7/62), 36.36% (4/11), and 100% (3/3), respectively. The incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy was 3.91% (10/256), 9.58% (16/167), 4.84% (3/62), 9.09% (1/11), and 100% (3/3), respectively while the operative mortality was 5.49% (15/256), 4.22% (7/167), 4.84% (3/62), 9.09% (1/11), and 66.67% (2/3) respectively. The operative mortality of liver transplantation was 22.22% (2/9).

Conclusion: Five kinds of operation in surgical treatment of portal hypertension have their advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the selection of operation should be based on the actual needs of the patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Isaksson B, Hultberg B, Hansson L, Bengtsson F, Jeppsson B. Effect of mesocaval interposition shunting and repeated sclerotherapy on blood levels of gastrointestinal regulatory peptides, amino acids, and lysosomal enzymes--a prospective randomised trial. Liver. 1999;19:3–11. - PubMed
    1. Malesci A, Tacconi M, Valentini A, Basilico M, Lorenzano E, Salerno F. Octreotide long-term treatment in patients with portal hypertension: persistent inhibition of postprandial glucagon response without major changes in renal function. J Hepatol. 1997;26:816–825. - PubMed
    1. Gülberg V, Haag K, Rössle M, Gerbes AL. Hepatic arterial buffer response in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2002;35:630–634. - PubMed
    1. Miyamoto Y, Oho K, Kumamoto M, Toyonaga A, Sata M. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration improves liver function in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:934–942. - PubMed
    1. Asakura T, Ohkohchi N, Orii T, Koyamada N, Tsukamoto S, Sato M, Enomoto Y, Usuda M, Satomi S. Portal vein pressure is the key for successful liver transplantation of an extremely small graft in the pig model. Transpl Int. 2003;16:376–382. - PubMed