Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug 15;19(16):1840-3.
doi: 10.1101/gad.1311805. Epub 2005 Jul 29.

Starvation and oxidative stress resistance in Drosophila are mediated through the eIF4E-binding protein, d4E-BP

Affiliations

Starvation and oxidative stress resistance in Drosophila are mediated through the eIF4E-binding protein, d4E-BP

Gritta Tettweiler et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

eIF4E, the mRNA 5' cap-binding protein, is regulated by its binding protein (4E-BP), a downstream target of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase [PI(3)K] signaling. We show that Drosophila 4E-BP (d4E-BP) activity becomes critical for survival under dietary restriction and oxidative stress, and is linked to life span. The Drosophila forkhead transcription factor (dFOXO) activates d4E-BP transcription. We show that ectopic expression of d4E-BP in dFOXO-null flies restores oxidative stress resistance to control levels. Thus, d4E-BP is an important downstream effector of a dFOXO phenotype, and regulation of translation by eIF4E is vital during environmental stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Life span of D. melanogaster is affected by the eIF4E inhibitory protein, 4E-BP. (A) The median life span of d4E-BPnull males (n = 97) is ∼25% reduced compared with revertant males (n = 157). (—•—) d4E-BPnull flies; (—▵—) revertant control. Statistical comparison (log-rank test): revertant control vs. d4E-BPnull, p < 0.0001. (B) A null mutation in d4E-BP has a comparable effect on the life span of female animals. Statistical comparison (log-rank test): revertant control (n = 165) vs. d4E-BPnull (n = 86), p < 0.0001.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time course of increasing expression of d4E-BP in response to nutrient stress: 40-h-old larvae of revertant animals were subjected to complete starvation. Identical amounts of total protein (30 μg) were analyzed by Western blot with 1868 antibody to d4E-BP. Loading control, α-tubulin.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
d4E-BP binding to eIF4E is required to rescue nutritional stress resistance. Eggs were subjected to complete starvation, and surviving larvae were counted every 12 h. d4E-BPnull larvae (—•—) died significantly faster than revertant control larvae (—▵—). This effect can be rescued by overexpression of d4E-BP (—□—), but not by overexpression of d4E-BP(Y54A,M59A) (—▪—), a mutant form that cannot bind to eIF4E. Statistical comparison (log-rank test): revertant control (n = 157) vs. d4E-BPnull (n = 200), and revertant control vs. d4E-BPnull; Hsp70-GAL4/UAS-d4E-BP(Y54A,M59A) (n = 270), p < 0.0001. Revertant control vs. d4E-BPnull; Hsp70-Gal4/UAS-d4E-BP(wt) (n = 102), p = 0.345 (not significant). Each data point represents the aggregate of results from three independent experiments.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
d4E-BP mediates the oxidative stress resistance of dFOXO. Flies were exposed to 5% H2O2, and survival was determined at 12-h intervals. Oregon-R flies were used as control. For d4E-BPnull (—•—) and dFOXO-null flies (—♦—), mortality at 60 h was 100% and 98%, respectively, compared with 33.9% for Oregon-R (—▴—). Ectopic expression of d4E-BP in a d4E-BPnull background rescued this effect (—□—, 64% mortality at 60 h), but not ectopic expression of d4E-BP(Y54A,M59A) (—▪—, 99.6% mortality at 60 h). Overexpression of d4E-BP in a dFOXO-null background (—⋄—, 60.3% mortality after 60 h) rescued the stress-sensitive phenotype of dFOXO-null flies. Survival data from three to six independent experiments were combined to clarify statistical analysis. Statistical comparison (log-rank test): Oregon-R (n = 118) vs. dFOXO-null (n = 224), Oregon-R vs. d4E-BPnull (n = 120), Oregon-R vs. d4E-BPnull;Hsp70-Gal4/UAS-d4E-BP(wt) (n = 150), Oregon-R vs. d4E-BPnull; Hsp70GAL4/UAS-d4E-BP(Y54A,M59A) (n = 274), all p < 0.0001. Oregon-R vs. Act5CGAL4/UAS-d4E-BP(wt);dFOXO-null (n = 156), p = 0.109 (not significant). Supplementary Figure S2 provides evidence that ectopic expression of d4E-BP can also rescue starvation sensitivity of dFOXO-null larvae.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
d4E-BP is an important downstream effector of the dFOXO phenotype. Under oxidative stress, dFOXO becomes dephosphorylated, and enters the nucleus to activate d4E-BP transcription. Amino acid starvation inhibits the dTOR pathway in the larval fat body, which results in suppression of the Inr/PI3K pathway in peripheral tissues. This affects d4E-BP regulation in two ways. First, suppression of Inr/PI3K signaling leads to inactivation of dAkt. Consequently, dAkt cannot phosphorylate dFOXO, resulting in enhanced transport of dFOXO to the nucleus and transcriptional activation of d4E-BP. Also, the d4E-BP kinase dTOR is a downstream target of the PI3K pathway. Under starvation, dTOR is inactive, such that d4E-BP does not become phosphorylated, and can interact with eIF4E. Thus, amino acid starvation increases both the protein level and activity of d4E-BP, which results in repression of cap-dependent translation.

References

    1. Avdulov S., Li, S., Michalek, V., Burrichter, D., Peterson, M., Perlman, D.M., Manivel, J.C., Sonenberg, N., Yee, D., Bitterman, P.B., et al. 2004. Activation of translation complex eIF4F is essential for the genesis and maintenance of the malignant phenotype in human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Cell 5: 553–563. - PubMed
    1. Bernal A. and Kimbrell, D.A. 2000. Drosophila Thor participates in host immune defense and connects a translational regulator with innate immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 6019–6024. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernal A., Schoenfeld, R., Kleinhesselink, K., and Kimbrell, D. 2004. Loss of Thor, the single 4E-BP gene of Drosophila, does not result in lethality. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 87: 81–84.
    1. Bjornsti M.A. and Houghton, P.J. 2004. Lost in translation: Dysregulation of cap-dependent translation and cancer. Cancer Cell 5: 519–523. - PubMed
    1. Brand A.H. and Perrimon, N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401–415. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances