Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients
- PMID: 16059723
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2731-0
Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients
Abstract
Objective: To test whether fluid responsiveness can be predicted by the respiratory variation in aortic blood flow and/or the flow time corrected for heart rate monitored with esophageal Doppler.
Design and setting: Prospective study in a 24-bed medical intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Patients: 38 mechanically ventilated patients with sinus rhythm and without spontaneous breathing activity in whom volume expansion was planned.
Interventions: The aortic blood flow was measured using an esophageal Doppler monitoring device before and after fluid infusion (500 ml NaCl 0.9% over 10 min). The variation in aortic blood flow over a respiratory cycle between its minimal and maximal values was calculated. The flow time was also measured.
Measurements and results: Aortic blood flow increased by at least 15% after volume expansion in 20 patients (defined as responders). Before fluid infusion the respiratory variation in aortic flow was higher in responders than in nonresponders (28+/-12% vs. 12+/-5%). It significantly decreased after volume expansion (18+/-11%) in responders only. A respiratory variation in aortic flow before volume expansion of at least 18% predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 94%. Flow time increased with fluid infusion in responders and nonresponders. A flow time corrected for heart rate below 277 ms predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 94%. The area under the ROC curve generated for variation in aortic blood flow ABF was greater than that generated for flow time.
Conclusions: The respiratory variation in aortic blood flow reliably predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with sinus rhythm and without breathing activity.
Comment in
-
Assessing fluid responsiveness with esophageal Doppler dynamic indices: concepts and methods.Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jul;32(7):1088; author reply 1090-1. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0156-z. Epub 2006 Apr 28. Intensive Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16791674 No abstract available.
-
The FTc is not an accurate marker of left ventricular preload.Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jul;32(7):1089; author reply 1091. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0157-y. Epub 2006 Apr 28. Intensive Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16791675 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1402-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215453.11735.06. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16540963
-
An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):541-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a500. Anesthesiology. 2011. PMID: 21792056
-
Respiratory variation in peak aortic velocity accurately predicts fluid responsiveness in children undergoing neurosurgery under general anesthesia.J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Apr;32(2):221-226. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0013-3. Epub 2017 Mar 16. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018. PMID: 28299589
-
Prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Jun;14(3):334-9. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282fd6e1e. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 18467896 Review.
-
Respiratory variation in peripheral arterial blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0635-0. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018. PMID: 30424730 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A Physiologic Approach to Hemodynamic Monitoring and Optimizing Oxygen Delivery in Shock Resuscitation.J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 30;9(7):2052. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072052. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32629778 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challenge.Crit Care. 2012 Oct 29;16(5):R212. doi: 10.1186/cc11846. Crit Care. 2012. PMID: 23107227 Free PMC article.
-
Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices.Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R109. doi: 10.1186/cc9058. Epub 2010 Jun 10. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20537159 Free PMC article.
-
Defining the boundaries of bedside pulse contour analysis: dynamic arterial elastance.Crit Care. 2011;15(1):120. doi: 10.1186/cc9986. Epub 2011 Feb 9. Crit Care. 2011. PMID: 21345250 Free PMC article.
-
A framework for flow time measured by Doppler ultrasound.Ultrasound J. 2025 Jan 21;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13089-025-00414-8. Ultrasound J. 2025. PMID: 39836314 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical