Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study
- PMID: 16060799
- DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.483
Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study
Abstract
Discrepancies often exist among different informants' (e.g., parents, children, teachers) ratings of child psychopathology. Informant discrepancies have an impact on the assessment, classification, and treatment of childhood psychopathology. Empirical work has identified informant characteristics that may influence informant discrepancies. Limitations of previous work include inconsistent measurement of informant discrepancies and, perhaps most importantly, the absence of a theoretical framework to guide research. In this article, the authors present a theoretical framework (the Attribution Bias Context Model) to guide research and theory examining informant discrepancies in the clinic setting. Needed directions for future research and theory include theoretically driven attention to conceptualizing informant discrepancies across informant pairs (e.g., parent-teacher, mother-father, parent-child, teacher-child) as well as developing experimental approaches to decrease informant discrepancies in the clinic setting.
Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Measuring informant discrepancies in clinical child research.Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):330-4. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.330. Psychol Assess. 2004. PMID: 15456389
-
Strategic objectives for improving understanding of informant discrepancies in developmental psychopathology research.Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Aug;25(3):669-82. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000096. Dev Psychopathol. 2013. PMID: 23880384
-
Commentary: Definitely more than measurement error: but how should we understand and deal with informant discrepancies?J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(1):80-6. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533416. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21229445
-
Relationship assessment in clinical practice.Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2009 Jul;18(3):581-91. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2009.02.006. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2009. PMID: 19486839 Review.
-
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x. Obes Rev. 2006. PMID: 16371076 Review.
Cited by
-
Concordance of parent-, teacher- and self-report ratings on the Conners 3 in adolescent survivors of cancer.Psychol Assess. 2016 Sep;28(9):1110-8. doi: 10.1037/pas0000265. Psychol Assess. 2016. PMID: 27537005 Free PMC article.
-
Brief report: Moving prevention into schools: The impact of a trauma-informed school-based intervention.J Adolesc. 2015 Aug;43:142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jun 25. J Adolesc. 2015. PMID: 26119503 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal investigation of executive function development employing task-based, teacher reports, and fNIRS multimethodology in 4- to 5-year-old children.Dev Sci. 2022 Nov;25(6):e13328. doi: 10.1111/desc.13328. Epub 2022 Oct 21. Dev Sci. 2022. PMID: 36221252 Free PMC article.
-
Examination of the Social Emotional Assets and Resilience Scales (SEARS) Youth Report: Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Validity.Assessment. 2022 Oct;29(7):1522-1531. doi: 10.1177/10731911211022844. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Assessment. 2022. PMID: 34105383 Free PMC article.
-
Effective Mental Health Screening in Adolescents: Should We Collect Data from Youth, Parents or Both?Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2017 Jun;48(3):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s10578-016-0665-0. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2017. PMID: 27363421 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical