Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Aug 20;331(7514):425.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38516.398067.E0.

Randomised trial of telephone intervention in chronic heart failure: DIAL trial

GESICA Investigators
Clinical Trial

Randomised trial of telephone intervention in chronic heart failure: DIAL trial

GESICA Investigators. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a centralised telephone intervention reduces the incidence of death or admission for worsening heart failure in outpatients with chronic heart failure.

Design: Multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 51 centres in Argentina (public and private hospitals and ambulatory settings).

Participants: 1518 outpatients with stable chronic heart failure and optimal drug treatment randomised, stratified by attending cardiologist, to telephone intervention or usual care.

Intervention: Education, counselling, and monitoring by nurses through frequent telephone follow-up in addition to usual care, delivered from a single centre.

Main outcome measure: All cause mortality or admission to hospital for worsening heart failure.

Results: Complete follow-up was available in 99.5% of patients. The 758 patients in the usual care group were more likely to be admitted for worsening heart failure or to die (235 events, 31%) than the 760 patients who received the telephone intervention (200 events, 26.3%) (relative risk reduction = 20%, 95% confidence interval 3 to 34, P = 0.026). This benefit was mostly due to a significant reduction in admissions for heart failure (relative risk reduction = 29%, P = 0.005). Mortality was similar in both groups. At the end of the study the intervention group had a better quality of life than the usual care group (mean total score on Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire 30.6 v 35, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: This simple, centralised heart failure programme was effective in reducing the primary end point through a significant reduction in admissions to hospital for heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flowchart of enrolment, randomisation, and follow-up of patients
Fig 2
Fig 2
Kaplan-Meier curves for rate of death from any cause or admission to hospital for heart failure (panel A), rate of death from any cause (panel B), and rate of admission for heart failure (panel C). HF=heart failure; RR=relative risk (with 95% confidence interval)
Fig 3
Fig 3
Subgroup analysis: admission to hospital for heart failure
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Bourassa MG, Gurne O, Bangdiwala SI, Ghali JK, Young JB, Rousseau M, et al. Natural history and patterns of current practice in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22: 14-19A. - PubMed
    1. Cohen-Solal A, Desnos M, Delahaye F, Emeriau JP, Hanania G. A national survey of heart failure in French hospitals. Eur Heart J 2000;21: 763-9. - PubMed
    1. Philbin EF, Rocco TA Jr, Lindenmuth NW, Ulrich K, Jenkins PL. Clinical outcomes in heart failure: report from a community hospital-based registry. Am J Med 1999;107: 549-55. - PubMed
    1. Croft JB, Giles WH, Pollard RA, Casper ML, Anda RF, Livengood JR. National trends in the initial hospitalization for heart failure. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45: 270-5. - PubMed
    1. Changes in Mortality From Heart Failure—United States, 1980-1995. MMWR 1998;47: 633-7. - PubMed