Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Jun;7(2):163-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1992.tb00792.x.

Experimental evaluation of the dialdehyde starch preserved bovine internal mammary artery as a small diameter arterial substitute

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Experimental evaluation of the dialdehyde starch preserved bovine internal mammary artery as a small diameter arterial substitute

A Welz et al. J Card Surg. 1992 Jun.

Abstract

A canine femoral artery model was used for evaluation of a dialdehyde starch preserved bovine internal mammary artery (BIMA) (3 and 4 mm internal diameter) in comparison to a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft. The study comprised three groups for a 2-hour (n = 7, 3 mm), 3-month (n = 10, 4 mm), and 6-month (n = 10, 4 mm) follow-up. The thrombogenicity of the grafts was measured after 2 hours and 3 months using chromium 51 labeled autologous platelets. In addition, compliance studies were done. To control the wall stability of the xenografts, the collagen content before implantation and after explantation was examined together with the diameter of the grafts. Healing characteristics were studied using appropriate histologic methods. The acute platelet adhesion rate (2 hours) of the BIMA graft was 181 +/- 69 x 10(4) platelets/mm2 as compared to 57 +/- 43 x 10(4) for PTFE (p less than 0.05, t-test). However, after 3 months the thrombogenicity of the biograft had decreased whereas the platelet count at the PTFE graft had increased (BIMA: 79 +/- 48 x 10(4); PTFE: 179 +/- 102 x 10(4), p less than 0.05). At implantation, the compliance of the BIMA graft was 0.028% +/- 0.009% per mmHg as compared to 0.06% +/- 0.0025% of the femoral artery. The PTFE graft was uncompliant (0.008 +/- 0.005). After 6 months, the compliance of the femoral artery had decreased to 0.039% +/- 0.013% per mmHg, which was now well matched to the nearly unchanged compliance of the biograft (0.0027 +/- 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources