[What suction drainage is optimal for drainage of wound secretion? A clinico-experimental study exemplified by the knee joint]
- PMID: 1606859
[What suction drainage is optimal for drainage of wound secretion? A clinico-experimental study exemplified by the knee joint]
Abstract
In a randomized clinical study on 40 intraarticular knee joint drainages the effect of a high vacuum, middle vacuum, low vacuum and suction free drainages were examined. The maximum of the volume that was drained had been in the group of the suction free drainages. Drains with a long period of suction had a minimum of evaluated ultrasonographic effusion in the knee joint. The group with high vacuum was obviously not as long as open as in the other groups. Thrombi in the drainages could be found in every group. This refers to the observation that the finding of adherent thrombi is related to the material the drain is made of. Adherent thrombi decrease the possibility of secretion, not adherent thrombi do not decrease suction volume. Referring to these results it is obvious that not the high-vacuum drainage is the matter of choice for intraarticular drains. The suction-free drainages or drains with reduced vacuum have more advantages in respect to simple, secure and fast implantation and handling.
Similar articles
-
[Gravity drainage versus suction drainage: an experimental and clinical study].Unfallchirurg. 1989 Jan;92(1):37-42. Unfallchirurg. 1989. PMID: 2644695 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Complications and risks of suction drainage].Z Gesamte Hyg. 1990 Feb;36(2):94-9. Z Gesamte Hyg. 1990. PMID: 2183501 Review. German.
-
[Pressure-volume analysis of wound suction drainage containers and suction capacity of drainage tubes].Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379(5):285-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00186394. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994. PMID: 7990623 German.
-
High-vacuum drains rival conventional underwater-seal drains after pediatric heart surgery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Mar;27(3):395-9; discussion 399-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.023. Epub 2004 Dec 25. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 15740945 Clinical Trial.
-
[Abdominal drainages].Chirurg. 2003 Feb;74(2):91-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0586-2. Chirurg. 2003. PMID: 12599025 Review. German.
Cited by
-
[The value of wound drainage with or without suction].Unfallchirurg. 2005 Nov;108(11):979-86. doi: 10.1007/s00113-005-1016-y. Unfallchirurg. 2005. PMID: 16228157 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Slit drainage in hip endoprosthesis--also an alternative in trauma surgery? A prospective follow-up study].Unfallchirurgie. 1996 Oct;22(5):223-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02641224. Unfallchirurgie. 1996. PMID: 9005676 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Gravity or suction drainage in thyroid surgery? Control of efficacy with ultrasound determination of residual hematoma].Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1996;381(6):337-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00191314. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1996. PMID: 9082107 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Aprotinin and classic wound drainage are unnecessary in total hip replacement - a prospective randomized trial.Eur J Med Res. 2011 Jan 27;16(1):20-8. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-16-1-20. Eur J Med Res. 2011. PMID: 21345766 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD001825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001825.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17636687 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources