Central and paracentral corneal pachymetry in patients with normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension
- PMID: 16075223
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-0053-0
Central and paracentral corneal pachymetry in patients with normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension
Abstract
Purpose: The difference in central corneal thickness among subgroups of glaucoma patients, as well as its influence on Goldmann applanation tonometry, has been well documented in several clinical trials. In the present study, possible similarities and differences between central corneal thickness and corneal thickness of paracentral quadrants in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) were investigated.
Methods: Central and paracentral corneal thickness was measured by optical slit scan pachymetry (Orbscan II). Fourteen patients (28 eyes) with NTG and 11 patients (22 eyes) with OHT were included in this study. t-Test was performed for statistical analysis. To evaluate overall corneal topography, the mean and SD values of the differences between the central corneal thickness and each peripheral quadrant were analysed.
Results: The following data was obtained (microm): (central, upper, temporal, nasal, inferior paracentral quadrant): OHT group 617-695-663-687-660. NTG group 568-629-593-612-616. Corneal thickness of all four paracentral quadrants differed significantly between the OHT and NTG groups. There was a more heterogeneous intraindividual pattern of overall corneal topography in the OHT group, and a more heterogeneous pattern of corneal topography among the individuals of the NTG group (interindividual heterogeneity).
Conclusions: A comparison of central corneal thickness and paracentral corneal thickness revealed clinically relevant differences between the OHT and NTG groups. The presented data underlines the importance of correlating the site of applanation with the corresponding corneal thickness, especially in OHT patients. It further substantiates the necessity to obtain individual pachymetric data for each NTG patient.
Similar articles
-
Correlation between corneal and scleral thickness in glaucoma.J Glaucoma. 2009 Jan;18(1):32-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31816b2fd1. J Glaucoma. 2009. PMID: 19142132
-
Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.J Glaucoma. 2012 Sep;21(7):486-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318220daf0. J Glaucoma. 2012. PMID: 21734593
-
Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;104(1):121-126. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313493. Epub 2019 Mar 28. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 30923134 Free PMC article.
-
Corneal Biomechanics in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Glaucoma. 2023 Mar 1;32(3):e24-e32. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002170. Epub 2022 Dec 30. J Glaucoma. 2023. PMID: 36583701
-
[Corneal pachymetry and intraocular pressure].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005 Jul;222(7):558-67. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858113. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005. PMID: 16034723 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1521-1527. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.07. eCollection 2017. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 29062770 Free PMC article.
-
Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques.ISRN Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 4;2014:724546. doi: 10.1155/2014/724546. eCollection 2014. ISRN Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24729900 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Current aspects on the management of normal tension glaucoma].Ophthalmologe. 2015 Nov;112(11):943-54; quiz 955-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-0140-5. Ophthalmologe. 2015. PMID: 26443680 Review. German.
-
Biomechanical Glaucoma Factor and Corneal Hysteresis in Treated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Their Associations With Visual Field Progression.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021 Jun 1;62(7):4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.7.4. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021. PMID: 34086046 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures - a different result with different pachymeters.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;245(11):1603-10. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0601-x. Epub 2007 May 24. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17522884
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources