Revisiting junk DNA
- PMID: 1608047
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00162975
Revisiting junk DNA
Abstract
The distribution of functions within genomes of higher organisms relative to processes that lead to the spread of mutations in populations is examined in its general outlines. A number of points are enumerated that collectively put in question the concept of junk DNA: the plausible compatibility of DNA function with rapid substitution rates; the likelihood of superimposed functions along much of eukaryotic DNA; the potential for a merely conditional functionality in sequence repeats; the apparent adoption of macromolecular waste as a strategy for maintaining a function without selective grooming of individual sequence repeats that carry out the function; the likely requirement that any DNA sequence must be "polite" vis-'a-vis (compatible with) functional sequences in its genomic environment; the existence in germ-cell lineages of selective constraints that are not apparent in populations of individuals; and the fact that DNA techtonics - the appearance and disappearance of genomic DNA - are not incompatible with function. It is pointed out that the inverse correlation between functional constraints and rates of substitution cannot be claimed to be pillar of the neutral theory, because it is also predicted from a selectionist viewpoint. The dispensability of functional structures is brought into relation with the concept of reproductive sufficiency the survivability of genotypes in the absence of fitter alleles.
Similar articles
-
Structural and functional liaisons between transposable elements and satellite DNAs.Chromosome Res. 2015 Sep;23(3):583-96. doi: 10.1007/s10577-015-9483-7. Chromosome Res. 2015. PMID: 26293606 Review.
-
Polite DNA: functional density and functional compatibility in genomes.J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1-2):12-27. doi: 10.1007/BF02099947. J Mol Evol. 1986. PMID: 3104611
-
Repetitive DNA in eukaryotic genomes.Chromosome Res. 2015 Sep;23(3):415-20. doi: 10.1007/s10577-015-9499-z. Chromosome Res. 2015. PMID: 26514350
-
Why so many noncoding nucleotides? The eukaryote genome as an epigenetic machine.Genetica. 2002 May;115(1):105-29. doi: 10.1023/a:1016080316076. Genetica. 2002. PMID: 12188043 Review.
-
Satellite DNA from the Y chromosome of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.Genetics. 2005 Jan;169(1):185-96. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.034264. Epub 2004 Sep 30. Genetics. 2005. PMID: 15466420 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Dispensability of mammalian DNA.Genome Res. 2008 Nov;18(11):1743-51. doi: 10.1101/gr.080184.108. Epub 2008 Oct 2. Genome Res. 2008. PMID: 18832441 Free PMC article.
-
From chemical metabolism to life: the origin of the genetic coding process.Beilstein J Org Chem. 2017 Jun 12;13:1119-1135. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.13.111. eCollection 2017. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2017. PMID: 28684991 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-Coding RNAs in Diagnostic Pathology of High-Grade Central Osteosarcoma.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 28;15(11):1355. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111355. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40506925 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolutionary consequences of nonrandom damage and repair of chromatin domains.J Mol Evol. 1992 Aug;35(2):156-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00183227. J Mol Evol. 1992. PMID: 1501255 Review.
-
"Word" preference in the genomic text and genome evolution: different modes of n-tuplet usage in coding and noncoding sequences.J Mol Evol. 2005 Jul;61(1):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0209-2. Epub 2005 Jul 19. J Mol Evol. 2005. PMID: 16059753