Efficacy of Seprafilm for reducing reoperative risk in pediatric surgical patients undergoing abdominal surgery
- PMID: 16080936
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.05.015
Efficacy of Seprafilm for reducing reoperative risk in pediatric surgical patients undergoing abdominal surgery
Abstract
Background: The safety and efficacy of Seprafilm (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, Mass) in adult surgery patients have been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Seprafilm in pediatric surgical patients.
Methods: One hundred twenty-two pediatric abdominal surgery patients were enrolled. Sixty-seven patients received Seprafilm application. Of these patients, 18 again received Seprafilm at abdominal closure during a second surgery, and of the 18, 4 received Seprafilm at closure after a third surgery. Of the 55 control patients who did not receive Seprafilm, 14 had a second surgery, and of these 14 patients, 4 had a third surgery. Adverse events, operation time, and blood loss were compared with assessed Seprafilm safety. Seprafilm efficacy evaluations included incidence and severity of adhesions in those patients who required relaparotomy.
Results: The incidence (Seprafilm, 40.9%; control, 82.4%) and severity (Seprafilm: 59.1%, grade 0; control: 17.6%, grade 0) of adhesions under the abdominal incision site were significantly reduced in the Seprafilm group (P = .007 and P = .0009, respectively). In addition, mean relaparotomy operation time was significantly shorter for Seprafilm patients (P = .004). At relaparotomy, blood loss/body weight ratio for Seprafilm patients compared with control patients showed a trend toward but did not reach significance (P = .09).
Conclusions: Decreased incidence and severity of postsurgical adhesions with Seprafilm in pediatric patients may lead to reduction of the risks associated with subsequent operation.
Similar articles
-
The use of Seprafilm in pediatric surgical patients.Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):792-5. Am Surg. 2007. PMID: 17879686
-
Application of Adcon-P or Seprafilm in consecutive laparotomies using a murine model.Am J Surg. 2004 Feb;187(2):304-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.014. Am J Surg. 2004. PMID: 14769326
-
Preclinical evaluation of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane.Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;(577):40-8. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997. PMID: 9076451 Review.
-
The effectiveness of hyaluronan-carboxymethylcellulose membrane in different severity of adhesions observed at the time of relaparotomies: an experimental study on mice.Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Oct;51(10):1562-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9385-2. Epub 2008 Jul 17. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18633676
-
Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions.Colorectal Dis. 2007 Oct;9 Suppl 2:25-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x. Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17824967 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies.Biomolecules. 2021 Jul 14;11(7):1027. doi: 10.3390/biom11071027. Biomolecules. 2021. PMID: 34356652 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Barrier materials for prevention of surgical adhesions: systematic review.BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3):zrac075. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac075. BJS Open. 2022. PMID: 35661871 Free PMC article.
-
Seprafilm(®) adhesion barrier: (2) a review of the clinical literature on intraabdominal use.Gynecol Surg. 2012 Sep;9(3):247-257. doi: 10.1007/s10397-012-0742-8. Epub 2012 Apr 15. Gynecol Surg. 2012. PMID: 22837733 Free PMC article.
-
Trehalose does not affect the functions of human neutrophils in vitro.Surg Today. 2014 Feb;44(2):332-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0625-2. Epub 2013 May 23. Surg Today. 2014. PMID: 23700245
-
Safety evaluation of surgical materials by cytotoxicity testing.J Artif Organs. 2008;11(4):204-11. doi: 10.1007/s10047-008-0429-0. Epub 2008 Dec 17. J Artif Organs. 2008. PMID: 19184285
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical