The impact of patient self-testing of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: rationale and design of VA Cooperative Study #481--the Home INR Study (THINRS)
- PMID: 16082603
- DOI: 10.1007/s11239-005-1452-0
The impact of patient self-testing of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: rationale and design of VA Cooperative Study #481--the Home INR Study (THINRS)
Abstract
Background: Anticoagulation (AC) with warfarin reduces the risk of thromboembolism (TE) in a variety of applications, yet despite compelling evidence of the value and importance of high quality AC, warfarin remains underused, and dosing is often suboptimal. Approaches to improve AC quality include (1) an AC service (ACS), which allows the physician to delegate day-to-day details of AC management to another provider dedicated to AC care, and (2) incorporating into the treatment plan patient self-testing (PST) under which, after completing a training program, patients perform their own blood testing (typically, using a finger-stick blood analyzer), have dosage adjustments guided by a standard protocol, and forward test results, dosing and other information to the provider. Studies have suggested that PST can improve the quality of AC and perhaps lower TE and bleed rates. The purpose of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) #481, "The Home INR Study" (THINRS) is to compare AC management with frequent PST using a home monitoring device to high quality AC management (HQACM) implemented by an ACS with conventional monitoring of prothrombin time by international normalized ratio (INR) on major health outcomes. PST in THINRS involves use of an INR monitoring device that is FDA approved for home use.
Study design: Sites are VA Medical Centers where the ACS has an active roster of more than 400 patients. THINRS includes patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or mechanical heart valve (MHV) expected to be anticoagulated indefinitely. THINRS has two parts. In Part 1, candidates for PST are evaluated for 2 to 4 weeks for their ability to use home monitoring devices. In Part 2, individuals capable of performing PST are randomized to (1) HQACM with testing every 4 weeks and as indicated for out of range values, medication/clinical changes, or (2) PST with testing every week and as indicated for out of range values, medication/clinical changes. The primary outcome measure is event rates, defined as the percent of patients who have a stroke, major bleed, or die. Secondary outcomes include total time in range (TTR), other events (myocardial infarction (MI), non-stroke TE, minor bleeds), competence and compliance with PST, satisfaction with AC, AC associated quality of life (QOL), and cost-effectiveness. To assess the effect of PST frequency on TTR and other outcomes, at selected sites patients randomized to perform PST are assigned one of three test frequencies (weekly, twice weekly, or once every four weeks).
Similar articles
-
An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010 Oct;30(3):263-75. doi: 10.1007/s11239-010-0499-8. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010. PMID: 20628787
-
The impact of frequency of patient self-testing of prothrombin time on time in target range within VA Cooperative Study #481: The Home INR Study (THINRS), a randomized, controlled trial.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Jul;40(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s11239-014-1128-8. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015. PMID: 25209313 Clinical Trial.
-
At-Home Versus In-Clinic INR Monitoring: A Cost-Utility Analysis from The Home INR Study (THINRS).J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Sep;31(9):1061-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3700-8. Epub 2016 May 27. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27234663 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Home prothrombin time monitoring: a literature analysis.Am J Hematol. 2004 Oct;77(2):177-86. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20161. Am J Hematol. 2004. PMID: 15389909 Review.
-
Optimal Warfarin Management for the Prevention of Thromboembolic Events in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Evidence [Internet].Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2011 Nov. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2011 Nov. PMID: 24278997 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481--The Home INR Study (THINRS).J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010 Oct;30(3):263-75. doi: 10.1007/s11239-010-0499-8. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010. PMID: 20628787
-
Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(12):1-114. Epub 2009 Sep 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009. PMID: 23074516 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of frequency of patient self-testing of prothrombin time on time in target range within VA Cooperative Study #481: The Home INR Study (THINRS), a randomized, controlled trial.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Jul;40(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s11239-014-1128-8. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015. PMID: 25209313 Clinical Trial.
-
Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 5;4(4):CD008600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008600.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28378924 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and effectiveness of point-of-care monitoring devices in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy: a meta-analysis.Open Med. 2007;1(3):e131-46. Epub 2007 Oct 16. Open Med. 2007. PMID: 21673942 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous