Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Apr;12(2):244-64.
doi: 10.3758/bf03196369.

Olfactory imagery: a review

Affiliations
Review

Olfactory imagery: a review

Richard J Stevenson et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr.

Abstract

Olfaction's unique cognitive architecture, the apparently inconsistent evidence favoring imagery, and its difficulty of evocation have led some to conclude that there is no capacity for olfactory imagery. Using three streams of evidence, we examine the validity of this claim. First, self-reports of olfactory imagery can resemble those obtained for actual perception. Second, imagining an odor can produce effects similar to actual perception. Third, olfactory perception and memory-based images can interact. A model of olfactory imagery is then presented that utilizes the same systems employed in actual perception, with similar constraints. This model is consistent with olfaction's unique information-processing capacities and can account for previous experimental inconsistencies on the basis of difficulty of evocation, a consequence of unstable access to semantic information. In sum, the evidence presented here is favorable to the existence of an olfactory imagery capacity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999;23 (3):391-8 - PubMed
    1. Neurology. 1958 Apr;8(4):250-60 - PubMed
    1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):708-12 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Mar;26(2):423-40 - PubMed
    1. Chem Senses. 2001 Jun;26(5):551-76 - PubMed