The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy
- PMID: 16084037
- DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.06.004
The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy
Abstract
Objective: In a large unselected population of normal spontaneous pregnancies, to estimate the biologic variation of the interval from the first day of the last menstrual period to start of pregnancy, and the biologic variation of gestational length to delivery; and to estimate the random error of routine ultrasound assessment of gestational age in mid-second trimester.
Study design: Cohort study of 11,238 singleton pregnancies, with spontaneous onset of labour and reliable last menstrual period. The day of delivery was predicted with two independent methods: According to the rule of Nägele and based on ultrasound examination in gestational weeks 17-19. For both methods, the mean difference between observed and predicted day of delivery was calculated. The variances of the differences were combined to estimate the variances of the two partitions of pregnancy.
Results: The biologic variation of the time from last menstrual period to pregnancy start was estimated to 7.0 days (standard deviation), and the standard deviation of the time to spontaneous delivery was estimated to 12.4 days. The estimate of the standard deviation of the random error of ultrasound assessed foetal age was 5.2 days.
Conclusion: Even when the last menstrual period is reliable, the biologic variation of the time from last menstrual period to the real start of pregnancy is substantial, and must be taken into account. Reliable information about the first day of the last menstrual period is not equivalent with reliable information about the start of pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul;14(1):12-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14010012.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999. PMID: 10461332
-
A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep;8(3):178-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08030178.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8915087
-
Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jul;14(1):17-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14010017.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999. PMID: 10461333
-
Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;21 Suppl 2:22-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00858.x. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17803615 Review.
-
Normal labor: mechanism and duration.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005 Jun;32(2):145-64, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2005.01.001. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005. PMID: 15899352 Review.
Cited by
-
Quality of ultrasound biometry obtained by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;40(2):151-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.11091. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22262286 Free PMC article.
-
Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential.Expert Rev Proteomics. 2019 Sep;16(9):727-731. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2019.1654863. Epub 2019 Aug 17. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2019. PMID: 31422714 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical implications of first-trimester ultrasound dating in singleton pregnancies obtained through in vitro fertilization.PLoS One. 2022 Aug 24;17(8):e0272447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272447. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36001604 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of gestational age from fundal height: a solution for resource-poor settings.J R Soc Interface. 2012 Mar 7;9(68):503-10. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0376. Epub 2011 Aug 17. J R Soc Interface. 2012. PMID: 21849388 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03807-4. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33931016 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical