High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States
- PMID: 16084872
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.020
High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States
Abstract
Objective: To determine what percentage of embryos achieved through assisted reproductive technology (ART) do not result in a live birth and to examine the relationships among the number of embryos transferred, infants delivered, and embryos wasted.
Design: Retrospective correlational study of the U.S. summary data of ART results for the years of 1995-2001.
Patients: Fertility clinics reporting data to the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART).
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): Statistics for ART cycles using fresh, nondonor eggs and embryos were derived, and the percentage of embryos wasted each year was calculated. Trends over time were evaluated for percent embryos wasted, the average number of embryos transferred, and the delivery per transfer rate. Correlations between these variables were analyzed.
Result(s): The percentage of embryos transferred that did not produce a live birth was 90.8 in 1995 and decreased to 84.9 in 2001. This trend significantly correlated with a reduction in the number of embryos transferred (from 3.9 to 3.1) and with an improvement in delivery rate per transfer (25% to 33.4%).
Conclusion(s): The vast majority of embryos produced in vitro and transferred fail to develop into an infant, supporting the concept that only a small fraction of embryos has the capacity to become a live birth. Clinicians should strive to reduce embryonic wastage without an adverse effect on delivery rates by perfecting methods of ovarian stimulation and embryo screening, and by transferring fewer embryos.
Similar articles
-
Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.016. Epub 2007 Apr 18. Fertil Steril. 2007. PMID: 17445805
-
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004 Apr 30;53(1):1-20. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004. PMID: 15123982
-
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003 Aug 29;52(9):1-16. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003. PMID: 14532867
-
Assisted reproductive technologies and multiple gestations.Clin Perinatol. 2005 Jun;32(2):315-28, v. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2005.03.003. Clin Perinatol. 2005. PMID: 15922785 Review.
-
Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology.Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;107(1):183-200. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000194207.06554.5b. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16394060 Review.
Cited by
-
Anti-Müllerian hormone and progesterone levels in human follicular fluid are predictors of embryonic development.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Jun 19;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0492-9. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019. PMID: 31217014 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive ageing-turning back the clock?Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Feb;188(1):161-167. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1769-2. Epub 2018 Mar 2. Ir J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 29500731 Review.
-
A Review: Biomechanical Aspects of the Fallopian Tube Relevant to its Function in Fertility.Reprod Sci. 2024 Jun;31(6):1456-1485. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01479-x. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Reprod Sci. 2024. PMID: 38472710 Review.
-
Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients.Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1436-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep039. Epub 2009 Feb 26. Hum Reprod. 2009. PMID: 19246470 Free PMC article.
-
Metabolomics and its application for non-invasive embryo assessment in IVF.Mol Hum Reprod. 2008 Dec;14(12):679-90. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gan066. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008. PMID: 19129367 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical