Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision
- PMID: 16084886
- PMCID: PMC2811165
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.134
Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision
Abstract
Objective: To ascertain what couples think about their embryos and how they approach making a decision about disposition in light of the fact that the disposition of unused frozen embryos has significant implications for medical research and embryo donation.
Design: Ethnographic qualitative interview study.
Setting: Academic research environment.
Patient(s): Fifty-eight couples who had conceived using a donor oocyte and had at least one frozen embryo in storage.
Main outcome measure(s): Tape-recorded interviews with 58 wives and 37 husbands were transcribed and analyzed for emergent themes.
Result(s): With an average of 7.1 embryos per couple, after an average of 4.2 years of storage, 72% of couples with frozen embryos had not reached a disposition decision. Most couples had not anticipated or appreciated the consequences of having surplus embryos. Parents variously conceptualized frozen embryos as biologic tissue, living entities, "virtual" children having interests that must be considered and protected, siblings of their living children, genetic or psychological "insurance policies," and symbolic reminders of their past infertility.
Conclusion(s): The disposition decision is not only a significant and frequently unresolved issue for couples with stored frozen embryos, but their deeply personal conceptualizations of their embryos contributes to their ambivalence, uncertainty, and difficulty in reaching a decision.
Similar articles
-
Survey of 243 ART patients having made a final disposition decision about their surplus cryopreserved embryos: the crucial role of symbolic embryo representation.Hum Reprod. 2016 Jul;31(7):1508-14. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew104. Epub 2016 May 10. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27165623
-
Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos.Fertil Steril. 2006 Jun;85(6):1623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056. Epub 2006 May 4. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 16678178
-
Donation of surplus frozen pre-embryos to research in Israel: underlying motivations.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Nov 5;5:25. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0085-4. eCollection 2016. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016. PMID: 27822357 Free PMC article.
-
Disposition intentions of elective egg freezers toward their surplus frozen oocytes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2021 Dec;116(6):1601-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1195. Epub 2021 Aug 25. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 34452749
-
The social implications of embryo cryopreservation.Fertil Steril. 2005 Oct;84(4):823-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.057. Fertil Steril. 2005. PMID: 16213829 Review.
Cited by
-
The decision-making process for the fate of frozen embryos by Japanese infertile women: a qualitative study.BMC Med Ethics. 2012 May 20;13:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-9. BMC Med Ethics. 2012. PMID: 22607034 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Model to Estimate the Optimal Number of Oocytes to Attempt to Fertilize During Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249395. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49395. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 36595292 Free PMC article.
-
Association between donor gamete use and supernumerary embryo disposition decisions.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Feb;40(2):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02690-y. Epub 2022 Dec 19. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 36529830 Free PMC article.
-
One size does not fit all: the personal nature of completed embryo donation.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1793-1806. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03156-z. Epub 2024 Jun 4. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 38833066 Free PMC article.
-
How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos.Fertil Steril. 2009 Dec;92(6):2094-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.027. Epub 2009 Aug 22. Fertil Steril. 2009. PMID: 19700150 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2001 Assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Dec, 2003.
-
- Hoffman DL, Zellman GL, Fair CC, Mayer JF, Zeitz JG, Gibbons WE, et al. Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1063–9. - PubMed
-
- Klock SC, Sheinin S, Kazer RR. The disposition of unused frozen embryos [letter] N Engl J Med. 2001;345:69–70. - PubMed
-
- McMahon CA, Gibson F, Cohen J, Leslie G, Tennant C, Saunders D. Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks, and embryo dilemmas. Reprod Technol. 2000;10:131–5.
-
- Robertson JA. Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:885–94. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous