Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug;84(2):431-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.134.

Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision

Affiliations

Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision

Robert D Nachtigall et al. Fertil Steril. 2005 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain what couples think about their embryos and how they approach making a decision about disposition in light of the fact that the disposition of unused frozen embryos has significant implications for medical research and embryo donation.

Design: Ethnographic qualitative interview study.

Setting: Academic research environment.

Patient(s): Fifty-eight couples who had conceived using a donor oocyte and had at least one frozen embryo in storage.

Main outcome measure(s): Tape-recorded interviews with 58 wives and 37 husbands were transcribed and analyzed for emergent themes.

Result(s): With an average of 7.1 embryos per couple, after an average of 4.2 years of storage, 72% of couples with frozen embryos had not reached a disposition decision. Most couples had not anticipated or appreciated the consequences of having surplus embryos. Parents variously conceptualized frozen embryos as biologic tissue, living entities, "virtual" children having interests that must be considered and protected, siblings of their living children, genetic or psychological "insurance policies," and symbolic reminders of their past infertility.

Conclusion(s): The disposition decision is not only a significant and frequently unresolved issue for couples with stored frozen embryos, but their deeply personal conceptualizations of their embryos contributes to their ambivalence, uncertainty, and difficulty in reaching a decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2001 Assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Dec, 2003.
    1. Hoffman DL, Zellman GL, Fair CC, Mayer JF, Zeitz JG, Gibbons WE, et al. Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1063–9. - PubMed
    1. Klock SC, Sheinin S, Kazer RR. The disposition of unused frozen embryos [letter] N Engl J Med. 2001;345:69–70. - PubMed
    1. McMahon CA, Gibson F, Cohen J, Leslie G, Tennant C, Saunders D. Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks, and embryo dilemmas. Reprod Technol. 2000;10:131–5.
    1. Robertson JA. Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:885–94. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources