Methods of monitoring shock
- PMID: 16088506
- PMCID: PMC3504461
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-860986
Methods of monitoring shock
Abstract
Intensive monitoring is a crucial component of the management of shock. However, there is little consensus about optimal strategies for monitoring. Although the pulmonary artery catheter has been widely used, conflicting data exist about the utility of this device. A variety of other techniques have been developed in hopes of providing clinically useful information about myocardial function, intravascular volume, and indices of organ function. In addition, there is evolving evidence that targeting and monitoring certain physiological goals may be most important early in the course of shock. In this chapter, we examine many of the available monitoring techniques and the evidence supporting their use.
References
-
- Zeni F, Freeman B, Natanson C. Anti-inflammatory therapies to treat sepsis and septic shock: a reassessment. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1095–1100. - PubMed
-
- Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:699–709. - PubMed
-
- Dellinger RP. Cardiovascular management of septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:946–955. - PubMed
-
- LeDoux D, Astiz ME, Carpati CM, Rackow EC. Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:2729–2732. - PubMed
-
- Dalen JE, Bone RC. Is it time to pull the pulmonary artery catheter? JAMA. 1996;276:916–918. - PubMed