Audience support and choking under pressure: a home disadvantage?
- PMID: 16089187
- DOI: 10.1080/02640410400021666
Audience support and choking under pressure: a home disadvantage?
Abstract
This paper highlights the not-so-obvious but compelling reasons why the same supportive audiences that can help performers attain their highest potential also may increase performers' risk of choking under pressure. Drawing primarily from social psychology research and theory, we conclude that audience support magnifies performance pressure and induces performers to avoid failure rather than seek success during the most critical moments of performance contests. Although supportive audiences can inspire performers to excel when motivation would otherwise be lacking, audiences may also lead performers towards maladaptive self-monitoring and overcautiousness when the stakes are highest. The increased self-focus that supportive audiences induce can disrupt the automatic execution of the skills performers possess. Dispositional and situational moderators of the relationship between audience support and performance are reviewed.
Similar articles
-
The trouble with friendly faces: skilled performance with a supportive audience.J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Nov;75(5):1213-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1213. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998. PMID: 9866184
-
[Choking under pressure: Positive public expectations and performance in a motor task].Z Exp Psychol. 1997;44(4):636-55. Z Exp Psychol. 1997. PMID: 9577226 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance.J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Mar;46(3):610-20. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.610. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984. PMID: 6707866
-
[Psychological aspects of home advantage].Psychiatr Hung. 2006;21(6):422-9. Psychiatr Hung. 2006. PMID: 17438659 Review. Hungarian.
-
The coach-athlete relationship: a motivational model.J Sports Sci. 2003 Nov;21(11):883-904. doi: 10.1080/0264041031000140374. J Sports Sci. 2003. PMID: 14626368 Review.
Cited by
-
Individual vs. Team Sport Failure-Similarities, Differences, and Current Developments.Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 24;13:930025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930025. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35814091 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Monkeys exhibit a paradoxical decrease in performance in high-stakes scenarios.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 31;118(35):e2109643118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109643118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 34426504 Free PMC article.
-
Elite darts performance and the social influence of real crowds and simulated crowd noise.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 31;13(1):12346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39378-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37524747 Free PMC article.
-
Read-the-game: System for skill-based visual exploratory activity assessment with a full body virtual reality soccer simulation.PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0230042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230042. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32182621 Free PMC article.
-
Under pressure: the interaction between high-stakes contexts and individual differences in decision-making in humans and non-human species.Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1103-1117. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01768-z. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36988737 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources