Radiology-assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access
- PMID: 1609072
- DOI: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609072
Radiology-assisted placement of implantable subcutaneous infusion ports for long-term venous access
Abstract
Implantable infusion port devices are generally placed surgically. A technique for radiology-guided placement in adults is described, and the experience with 103 attempted port placements between June 1989 and October 1991 is analyzed. Placements were successful in 102 attempts (99%). Minor procedural difficulties occurred in six patients (5.9%). One major procedural complication (large hematoma) precluded port placement. Two patients were lost to follow-up after uncomplicated placements. There were four (4.0% of 100 patients) minor late complications. Major late complications requiring port removal occurred in 13 (13.0%): five suspected catheter-related infections, four catheter-related venous thromboses refractory to thrombolysis, and one each of wound dehiscence, formation of hematoma near the port, extraluminal migration of the catheter, and poor blood return. With a cumulative follow-up of 15,880 days (43.5 patient-years) available, a rate of major complications of 13.6%, or 0.86% per 1,000 access days, is comparable to the rates of large surgical series. Radiology-guided placement of infusion ports is safe and may offer advantages over surgical implantation.
Similar articles
-
Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Nov;169(5):1431-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.5.9353475. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997. PMID: 9353475
-
Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;24(6):395-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0071-1. Epub 2001 Nov 8. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001. PMID: 11907746
-
Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.Ann Oncol. 1998 Jul;9(7):767-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1008392423469. Ann Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9739444
-
Venous access ports: indications, implantation technique, follow-up, and complications.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Aug;35(4):751-64. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0271-2. Epub 2011 Sep 16. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012. PMID: 21922348 Review.
-
Interventional radiology in the provision and maintenance of long-term central venous access.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008 Feb;52(1):10-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01904.x. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18373820 Review.
Cited by
-
Complications from port-a-cath system implantation in adults with malignant tumors: A 10-year single-center retrospective study.J Interv Med. 2021 Dec 9;5(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2021.12.002. eCollection 2022 Feb. J Interv Med. 2021. PMID: 35586285 Free PMC article.
-
Placement of port-a-cath through the right internal jugular vein under ultrasound guidance.Radiol Med. 2013 Jun;118(4):608-15. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0894-6. Epub 2012 Oct 22. Radiol Med. 2013. PMID: 23090255
-
Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients: single center experience.Support Care Cancer. 2006 Nov;14(11):1162-5. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0073-2. Epub 2006 Apr 5. Support Care Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16596418
-
Chinese expert consensus and practice guideline of totally implantable access port for digestive tract carcinomas.World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 7;26(25):3517-3527. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i25.3517. World J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32742123 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inversion of Central Venous Ports in Children Under Six Years Old: A Retrospective Analysis of 154 Oncology Patients.Cureus. 2024 Jun 25;16(6):e63106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63106. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39055458 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources