Incidence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the male partners attending an infertility clinic
- PMID: 16091321
- DOI: 10.1080/01443610500118749
Incidence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the male partners attending an infertility clinic
Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis is an important pathogen in the aetiology of pelvic inflammatory disease, resulting in female infertility. If all female infertility patients are screened for silent genital chlamydia infection, should the male partners of these patients also be screened to decrease the risk of re-infection? To determine the incidence of current and present male infection with C. trachomatis, we carried out a prospective clinical study. We studied 100 consecutive new male partners of patients seen in the infertility clinic. The infertility was of at least 12 months duration. We used polymerase chain reaction detection of C. trachomatis in urine specimens and microimmunofluorescence serology was performed to detect both past and current infection. The female partners were also screened for chlamydia infection by cervical swabs and serology. In five male patients (5%) C. trachomatis DNA was detected in the urine specimen by polymerase chain reaction. Microimmunofluorescence serology was positive in five patients (5%). One of the subjects had positive serology and urine polymerase chain reaction testing. The proportion of male partners with current or previous C. trachomatis infection was therefore 9% (95% CI 3.39 - 14.60). Seven female patients had positive serology results (7%), one of whom also had a positive cervical swab result indicating current infection with the pathogen. In four cases, both the male and female partner had positive serology results. The cost of screening for C. trachomatis is cheaper than treating the complications of undiagnosed genital Chlamydia infection, which is implicated in tubal disease leading to infertility. The results suggest that routine screening of male partners in an infertility setting may be justified.
Similar articles
-
[Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men and its association with gynecologic alterations in their sexual partners].Rev Invest Clin. 2005 May-Jun;57(3):406-14. Rev Invest Clin. 2005. PMID: 16187700 Spanish.
-
Risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix: a prospective study of 2000 patients at a family planning clinic.N Z Med J. 1987 Jul 8;100(827):401-3. N Z Med J. 1987. PMID: 3452064
-
A case control study of active genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection among patients with tubal infertility in northern Nigeria.Trop Doct. 2006 Jan;36(1):14-6. doi: 10.1258/004947506775598987. Trop Doct. 2006. PMID: 16483420
-
Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Jan;15(1):4-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02647.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009. PMID: 19220334 Review.
-
Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening.Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):189-204. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp035. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Hum Reprod Update. 2010. PMID: 19828674 Review.
Cited by
-
Chlamydial and gonococcal reinfection among men: a systematic review of data to evaluate the need for retesting.Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):304-9. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.024059. Epub 2006 Dec 13. Sex Transm Infect. 2007. PMID: 17166889 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of five commercial serological tests for the detection of anti-Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Jun;29(6):669-75. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-0912-4. Epub 2010 Mar 28. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20349260
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous