Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Nov;15(11):2330-40.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2856-0. Epub 2005 Aug 10.

CT dose reduction in children

Affiliations
Review

CT dose reduction in children

Peter Vock. Eur Radiol. 2005 Nov.

Erratum in

  • Eur Radiol. 2005 Nov;15(11):2383-4

Abstract

World wide, the number of CT studies in children and the radiation exposure by CT increases. The same energy dose has a greater biological impact in children than in adults, and scan parameters have to be adapted to the smaller diameter of the juvenile body. Based on seven rules, a practical approach to paediatric CT is shown: Justification and patient preparation are important steps before scanning, and they differ from the preparation of adult patients. The subsequent choice of scan parameters aims at obtaining the minimal signal-to-noise ratio and volume coverage needed in a specific medical situation; exposure can be divided in two aspects: the CT dose index determining energy deposition per rotation and the dose-length product (DLP) determining the volume dose. DLP closely parallels the effective dose, the best parameter of the biological impact. Modern scanners offer dose modulation to locally minimise exposure while maintaining image quality. Beyond the selection of the physical parameters, the dose can be kept low by scanning the minimal length of the body and by avoiding any non-qualified repeated scanning of parts of the body. Following these rules, paediatric CT examinations of good quality can be obtained at a reasonable cost of radiation exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Radiol. 1998 Jan;71(841):1-3 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2436-40 - PubMed
    1. Phys Med Biol. 2002 Jan 7;47(1):107-15 - PubMed
    1. Rofo. 1996 Nov;165(5):462-5 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Radiol. 2002 Oct;32(10):714-7; discussion 751-4 - PubMed