Audiotactile interactions in near and far space
- PMID: 16091968
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2393-8
Audiotactile interactions in near and far space
Abstract
In this study we investigated audiotactile spatial interactions in the region behind the head. In experiment 1, participants made unspeeded temporal order judgments (TOJs) regarding pairs of auditory and tactile stimuli presented at varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) using the method of constant stimuli. Electrocutaneous stimuli were presented to the left or right earlobe while auditory stimuli were presented from just behind the participant's head on either the same or opposite side. Participants responded significantly more accurately when the stimuli were presented from different sides rather than from the same side. In experiment 2, we used a distractor interference task to show that speeded left/right discrimination responses to electrocutaneous targets were also modulated by the spatial congruency of auditory distractors presented behind the head. Performance was worse (i.e. response latencies were slower and error rates higher) when the auditory distractors were presented on the opposite side to the electrocutaneous target than when they were presented on the same side. This crossmodal distractor interference effect was larger when white noise distractors were presented from close to the head (20 cm) than when they were presented far from the head (70 cm). By contrast, pure tone distractors elicited a smaller crossmodal distractor interference effect overall, and showed no modulation as a function of distance. Taken together, these results suggest that the spatial modulation of audiotactile interactions occurs predominantly for complex auditory stimuli (for example, white noise) originating from the region close to the back of the head.
Similar articles
-
Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May;31(10):1868-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07210.x. Eur J Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 20584191
-
Audiotactile temporal order judgments.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Mar;118(3):277-91. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.017. Epub 2004 Dec 9. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005. PMID: 15698825
-
Audiotactile interactions beyond the space and body parts around the head.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;228(4):427-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3574-5. Epub 2013 May 23. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23700131 Clinical Trial.
-
Audiotactile interactions in front and rear space.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):589-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 17. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011. PMID: 20621120 Review.
-
Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):171-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.008. J Physiol Paris. 2004. PMID: 15477031 Review.
Cited by
-
Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):429-54. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0070-4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011. PMID: 21400125 Review.
-
Comparison of peripersonal space in front and rear spaces.Exp Brain Res. 2024 Apr;242(4):797-808. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06782-2. Epub 2024 Feb 6. Exp Brain Res. 2024. PMID: 38319398
-
Perceptual grouping impairs temporal resolution.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Nov;183(2):141-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1034-9. Epub 2007 Jul 17. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17639362
-
Peripersonal space in the front, rear, left and right directions for audio-tactile multisensory integration.Sci Rep. 2021 May 28;11(1):11303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90784-5. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34050213 Free PMC article.
-
Multisensory aversive stimuli differentially modulate negative feelings in near and far space.Psychol Res. 2017 Jul;81(4):764-776. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0774-1. Epub 2016 May 5. Psychol Res. 2017. PMID: 27150637
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources