Assessment and amelioration of hyperacusis in tinnitus patients

Abstract

Conclusions: Tinnitus can be bothersome even without hyperacusis. The good correlation found in this study between the multiple-activity scale for hyperacusis (MASH) score and the overall annoyance of hyperacusis score supports the reliability of self-rating of hyperacusis. Objectives. A prospective study was undertaken to investigate the relationships between hyperacusis and tinnitus and to determine whether hyperacusis can be rapidly controlled over time.

Material and methods: All tinnitus patients seen over a period of 16 months with surnames beginning with the letters A L (n = 249) were assessed during a structured interview using (i) a scale ranging from 0 to 10 for assessing the annoyance of tinnitus and the overall annoyance of hyperacusis and (ii) the newly introduced MASH.

Results: The annoyance of tinnitus was greater in females. The prevalence of hyperacusis was high (79%). The annoyance of hyperacusis varied. Patients were categorized into five groups according to the hyperacusis annoyance score, as follows: no hyperacusis; mild hyperacusis (< or = 3); moderate hyperacusis (3.1-5.0); substantial hyperacusis (5.1-7.0); and severe hyperacusis (> or = 7.1). Individuals with severe hyperacusis were younger than those in the other groups. The correlation between the annoyance of tinnitus and the annoyance of hyperacusis was poor (r = 0.35). No audiometric difference was found between categories, whereas self-rated hearing deficiency increased with the annoyance of hyperacusis. A good correlation (r = 0.89) was found between the overall annoyance of hyperacusis and the MASH score. Changes over time, assessed in 32 patients investigated at least 3 times, showed more frequent improvement in hyperacusis (63%) than tinnitus (47%).