Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain
- PMID: 16093986
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169455.25510.ff
Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain
Abstract
Purpose: Laparoscopic prostatectomy, whether or not coupled with robotic assistance, is often considered less invasive than open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Minimal postoperative pain has been reported following robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) but there have been few comparative studies with RRP. We compared perioperative narcotic use and patient reported pain in a prospective patient series.
Materials and methods: Between June 2003 and May 2004, 314 patients underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution, including RALP in 159, RRP in 154 and conversion in 1. All patients were treated on a postoperative clinical pathway that included 30 mg ketorolac intravenously immediately postoperatively, followed by 15 mg intravenously every 6 hours. No regional anesthesia (epidural/spinal) narcotics or patient controlled analgesic pumps were used. All narcotic use was converted to morphine sulfate equivalents for purpose of analysis. A Likert scale of 0 to 10 was used to assess pain on the day of surgery, and on postoperative days 1 and 14.
Results: The total mean morphine sulfate equivalent +/- SD in patients in the RALP and RRP groups was low and, when corrected for length of stay, it was not statistically different (22.41 +/- 1.13 vs 23.01 +/- 1.16 mg, p = 0.72). Mean Likert pain perception scores were low at all time points in the RALP and RRP groups but statistically lower on the day of surgery in the RALP cohort (2.05 +/- 1.99 vs 2.60 +/- 2.25, p = 0.027). Patient reported mean pain scores were almost identical for RALP vs RRP on postoperative days 1 (1.76 +/- 1.87 vs 1.73 +/- 1.77, p = 0.880) and 14 (2.51 +/- 1.91 vs 2.42 +/- 1.84, p = 0.722).
Conclusions: Perioperative narcotic use and patient reported pain are low regardless of the surgical approach used for radical prostatectomy. RALP did not provide a clinically meaningful decrease in pain compared with RRP, primarily because of the low pain scores reported in each group. Outcomes other than pain will ultimately determine the role of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and RALP.
Similar articles
-
A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.J Clin Anesth. 2009 Aug;21(5):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 Aug 22. J Clin Anesth. 2009. PMID: 19700296
-
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17936849
-
Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?Urology. 2009 Mar;73(3):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Jan 23. Urology. 2009. PMID: 19167036
-
Radical prostatectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques.Can J Urol. 2006 Feb;13 Suppl 1:56-61. Can J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16526984 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages?J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 10;23(32):8170-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1963. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16278469 Review.
Cited by
-
Does changeover by an experienced open prostatic surgeon from open retropubic to robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy mean a step forward or backward?ISRN Oncol. 2013;2013:768647. doi: 10.1155/2013/768647. Epub 2013 Jan 21. ISRN Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23401798 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2158-2170. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.01. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 34159098 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room.J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 24;18(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01861-6. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38401027 Review.
-
Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Indications of Uteri Less Than Fourteen Weeks Size Versus More Than Fourteen Weeks Size: A Comparative Study.Cureus. 2021 May 26;13(5):e15263. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15263. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34189001 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074405 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical