Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve
- PMID: 16093987
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169458.96014.f8
Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the incidence of and analyzed factors that contributed to perioperative complications in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy, that is Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy (VIP), at our institution.
Materials and methods: We recorded operative and postoperative data on 300 consecutive patients who underwent VIP at our institution during a 1-year period. All operations were performed by 1 of 2 surgeons (MM or JOP). We reviewed the complications seen in these patients.
Results: There was no operative mortality and no case was converted to open surgery. A total of 269 (89.7%) patients were considered to have an ideal postoperative course, ie they were discharged home within 48 hours with no unscheduled office visits or complications. There were 14 unscheduled postoperative visits (4.7%) for transient urinary retention after early catheter removal (13) or hematuria (1). There were 17 complications, of which 16 (5.3%) were related to surgery and 1 was related to anesthesia. A total of 11 complications (3.7%) were minor (grade I) and 5 (1.7%) were major (grade II). Of them 3 (1%) patients required reoperation. There were no grade III or IV complications.
Conclusions: In our hands VIP is a safe operation with an overall complication rate of 5.3%, a major complication rate of less than 2% and a surgical re-intervention rate of 1%.
Similar articles
-
[Complications and incidences in our first 250 robotic radical prostatectomies].Actas Urol Esp. 2010 May;34(5):428-39. Actas Urol Esp. 2010. PMID: 20470715 Spanish.
-
The learning curve for reducing complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon.BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(3):420-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09847.x. Epub 2010 Nov 2. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 21050363
-
Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1738-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000092881.24608.5e. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 14532766
-
Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a review of the current state of affairs.Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;61(2):309-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01235.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2007. PMID: 17263718 Review.
-
Robotic radical prostatectomy: present and future.Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):839-46. Arch Esp Urol. 2011. PMID: 22052765 Review. English, Spanish.
Cited by
-
Complications following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a prospective Canadian cohort of 305 consecutive cases.Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Mar-Apr;7(3-4):116-21. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11116. Epub 2012 Mar 2. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013. PMID: 22398201 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of robotic surgery in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(3):197-210. doi: 10.1007/s11864-007-0028-y. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17721745 Review.
-
Does robotic prostatectomy meet its promise in the management of prostate cancer?Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Jun;14(3):184-91. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0327-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23564268 Review.
-
Intraoperative management of robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy.JSLS. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):1-5. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12674612014266. JSLS. 2010. PMID: 20529522 Free PMC article.
-
Transition from laparoscopic to robotic partial nephrectomy: the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.JSLS. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):291-7. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13071180407357. JSLS. 2011. PMID: 21985712 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical