Efficacy of tulathromycin in the treatment and prevention of natural outbreaks of bovine respiratory disease in European cattle
- PMID: 16094560
Efficacy of tulathromycin in the treatment and prevention of natural outbreaks of bovine respiratory disease in European cattle
Abstract
The efficacy of tulathromycin in the treatment (phase 1) and prevention (phase 2) of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) was evaluated on commercial farms in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. In phase 1, commingled cattle with clinical BRD were treated with tulathromycin (n = 128) or florfenicol (n = 125) on day 0. Similar percentages of animals showed sustained clinical improvement at day 14 (tulathromycin 83.3% versus florfenicol 81.0%) and had not relapsed by day 60 (tulathromycin 63.3% versus florfenicol 58.4%). In phase 2, healthy in-contact cattle were treated with tulathromycin (n = 492), tilmicosin (n = 494), or saline (n = 265) on day 0. Significantly more (P = .0001) tulathromycin-treated cattle remained healthy to day 14 (92.4%) than tilmicosin-treated (83.7%) or saline-treated (63.7%) cattle, and this was maintained through day 60 (tulathromycin 85.4% versus tilmicosin 75.1% and saline 56.2%). Tulathromycin was highly effective in the treatment and prevention of BRD.
Similar articles
-
Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin versus florfenicol and tilmicosin against undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle.Vet Ther. 2005 Summer;6(2):180-96. Vet Ther. 2005. PMID: 16094565 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin, tilmicosin, and florfenicol in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease in stocker cattle.Vet Ther. 2005 Summer;6(2):167-79. Vet Ther. 2005. PMID: 16094564 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of tulathromycin compared with tilmicosin and florfenicol for the control of respiratory disease in cattle at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.Vet Ther. 2005 Summer;6(2):154-66. Vet Ther. 2005. PMID: 16094563 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of treatment of cattle with bovine respiratory disease with tulathromycin.J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jun;30(3):234-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2007.00846.x. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2007. PMID: 17472655
-
Tulathromycin: an overview of a new triamilide antibiotic for livestock respiratory disease.Vet Ther. 2005 Summer;6(2):83-95. Vet Ther. 2005. PMID: 16094557 Review.
Cited by
-
The effects of administering different metaphylactic antimicrobials on growth performance and health outcomes of high-risk, newly received feedlot steers.Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Oct 15;6(4):txac140. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac140. eCollection 2022 Oct. Transl Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 36415567 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy of enrofloxacin to that of tulathromycin for the control of bovine respiratory disease and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Mannheimia haemolytica in calves at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.J Anim Sci. 2018 Apr 14;96(4):1259-1267. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky054. J Anim Sci. 2018. PMID: 29471391 Free PMC article.
-
Bovine Respiratory Disease in Veal Calves: Benefits Associated with Its Early Detection by Lung Ultrasonography and Its Prompt Treatment with a Single Dose of a Fixed Combination of Florfenicol and Meloxicam.Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 4;14(23):3499. doi: 10.3390/ani14233499. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39682464 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Tulathromycin against Pasteurella multocida in a Porcine Tissue Cage Model.Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 28;8:392. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00392. eCollection 2017. Front Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28701951 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of the relative efficacy of tulathromycin for the treatment of undifferentiated fever in feedlot calves in Nebraska.Can Vet J. 2007 Jun;48(6):600-6. Can Vet J. 2007. PMID: 17616056 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical