Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin, tilmicosin, and florfenicol in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease in stocker cattle
- PMID: 16094564
Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin, tilmicosin, and florfenicol in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease in stocker cattle
Abstract
The therapeutic efficacy and field safety of tulathromycin were evaluated in stocker calves with undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in three field studies conducted over two consecutive grazing seasons in Nebraska. Eight hundred calves exhibiting clinical signs of BRD and with rectal temperatures of 104 degrees F or higher were treated with tulathromycin (n = 340), florfenicol (n = 240), or tilmicosin (n = 220) and evaluated for approximately 60 days. Florfenicol and tilmicosin were administered as single SC injections according to labeled dosage. Tulathromycin was administered as a single SC injection of 2.5 mg/kg. In all three studies, the cure rate of calves 60 days after treatment with tulathromycin was significantly higher (P < or = .05) than that of calves treated with florfenicol or tilmicosin. Suspected adverse reactions were not reported for any of the study drugs. Tulathromycin proved to be significantly more effective than either florfenicol or tilmicosin in the treatment of BRD in stocker calves.
Similar articles
-
Comparative efficacy of tulathromycin versus florfenicol and tilmicosin against undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle.Vet Ther. 2005 Summer;6(2):180-96. Vet Ther. 2005. PMID: 16094565 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of tulathromycin compared with tilmicosin and florfenicol for the control of respiratory disease in cattle at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease.Vet Ther. 2005 Summer;6(2):154-66. Vet Ther. 2005. PMID: 16094563 Clinical Trial.
-
Therapeutic efficacy of tulathromycin, a novel triamilide antimicrobial, against bovine respiratory disease in feeder calves.Vet Ther. 2005 Summer;6(2):143-53. Vet Ther. 2005. PMID: 16094562 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of treatment of cattle with bovine respiratory disease with tulathromycin.J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jun;30(3):234-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2007.00846.x. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2007. PMID: 17472655
-
Tulathromycin: an overview of a new triamilide antibiotic for livestock respiratory disease.Vet Ther. 2005 Summer;6(2):83-95. Vet Ther. 2005. PMID: 16094557 Review.
Cited by
-
Lung Ultrasonography and Clinical Follow-Up Evaluations in Fattening Bulls Affected by Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) during the Restocking Period and after Tulathromycin and Ketoprofen Treatment.Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;12(8):994. doi: 10.3390/ani12080994. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35454241 Free PMC article.
-
Susceptibility to tulathromycin in Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from feedlot cattle over a 3-year period.Front Microbiol. 2013 Oct 9;4:297. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00297. eCollection 2013. Front Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 24130555 Free PMC article.
-
Anti-Inflammatory benefits of antibiotic-induced neutrophil apoptosis: tulathromycin induces caspase-3-dependent neutrophil programmed cell death and inhibits NF-kappaB signaling and CXCL8 transcription.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jan;55(1):338-48. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01052-10. Epub 2010 Oct 18. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011. PMID: 20956586 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Antimicrobial or Non-antimicrobial Treatments in Commercial Feedlot Cattle With Mild Bovine Respiratory Disease Based on a Refined Case-Definition.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 7;7:571697. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.571697. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 33134355 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of administering different metaphylactic antimicrobials on growth performance and health outcomes of high-risk, newly received feedlot steers.Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Oct 15;6(4):txac140. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac140. eCollection 2022 Oct. Transl Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 36415567 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical