Protective efficacy of intermediate and intermediate plus infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccines against very virulent IBDV in commercial broilers
- PMID: 16094828
- DOI: 10.1637/7310-112204R
Protective efficacy of intermediate and intermediate plus infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccines against very virulent IBDV in commercial broilers
Abstract
The evolution of very virulent (vv) infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) has led to significant economic losses in many poultry-producing areas. Despite vigorous vaccination strategies, IBDV has been difficult to control. The protective efficacy of IBDV vaccines is traditionally evaluated in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens. But under field conditions, residual maternal antibody (mAb) levels may interfere with vaccine efficacy. In this study, commercial broilers with various levels of maternally derived antibodies were vaccinated with IBDV vaccines of different virulence (vaccines 1-3, intermediate; vaccine 4, intermediate plus). At an average maternal virus-neutralizing antibody (mAb) level of log2 10.8 (range 7.6-11.6) at day of vaccination, only the intermediate plus vaccine induced IBDV antibodies after 18 days, while the other intermediate vaccines did not. At average mAb levels of log2 6.7 (range 5.6-8.6) at day of vaccination, all vaccines induced circulating antibodies, although the onset of antibody production differed significantly between strains (P < 0.05). While the intermediate plus vaccine induced enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay antibody levels already at 14 days postvaccination (PV), the intermediate vaccines induced significant antibody levels 28 (vaccines 1, 2) and 35 (vaccine 3) days PV. The time of IBDV antibody induction correlated with the onset of bursa lesions. The severity of lesions was comparable between vaccines 1, 3, and 4 (lesion score 4), while vaccine 2 induce only mild lesions of score 1 in 23% of the tested birds. Despite the induction of antibodies, none of the tested vaccines fully protected against challenge with vvIBDV. All challenged birds had either significantly higher bursal lesion scores or a higher IBDV antigen load in the bursa or sometimes both in comparison with nonchallenged birds (P < 0.05). Our study demonstrates that the evaluation of IBDV-vaccine efficacy is difficult in commercial broilers. For the first time, it was shown that the onset of bursa lesions and recovery of IBDV-vaccinated broilers is delayed in the presence of mAb in comparison with SPF chickens but not suppressed as previously assumed. At the time of challenge, vaccinated birds may still have significant bursa lesions and may lack target cells for IBDV-challenge virus. To be able to evaluate vaccine efficacy in commercial broilers, parameters such as intrabursal IBDV-antigen load should also be considered in conjunction with bursa lesion scores.
Similar articles
-
Comparative immunopathogenesis of mild, intermediate, and virulent strains of classic infectious bursal disease virus.Avian Dis. 2003 Jan-Mar;47(1):66-78. doi: 10.1637/0005-2086(2003)047[0066:CIOMIA]2.0.CO;2. Avian Dis. 2003. PMID: 12713160 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of Recombinant HVT-IBD Vaccines Administered to Broiler Chicks from a Single Breeder Flock at 30 and 60 Weeks of Age.Avian Dis. 2016 Sep;60(3):603-12. doi: 10.1637/11344-120815-Reg.1. Avian Dis. 2016. PMID: 27610719 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of three live vaccines against highly virulent infectious bursal disease virus in chickens with or without maternal antibodies.Avian Dis. 1995 Apr-Jun;39(2):218-29. Avian Dis. 1995. PMID: 7677642 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of a vectored vaccine against infectious bursal disease of chickens in the face of high-titred maternally derived antibody.J Comp Pathol. 2007 Jul;137 Suppl 1:S81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2007.04.017. Epub 2007 Jun 8. J Comp Pathol. 2007. PMID: 17560594 Review.
-
Infectious Bursal Disease: a complex host-pathogen interaction.Dev Comp Immunol. 2013 Nov;41(3):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 6. Dev Comp Immunol. 2013. PMID: 23567344 Review.
Cited by
-
Newcastle Disease Virus Vectored Bivalent Vaccine against Virulent Infectious Bursal Disease and Newcastle Disease of Chickens.Vaccines (Basel). 2017 Sep 26;5(4):31. doi: 10.3390/vaccines5040031. Vaccines (Basel). 2017. PMID: 28954433 Free PMC article.
-
A multiepitope vaccine candidate against infectious bursal disease virus using immunoinformatics-based reverse vaccinology approach.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jan 13;9:1116400. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1116400. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 36713875 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Immunogenicity Evaluation of Two Infectious Bursal Disease Vaccines Commonly Used in Broiler Chickens in Ethiopia.Vet Med (Auckl). 2022 Jan 19;13:31-38. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S346659. eCollection 2022. Vet Med (Auckl). 2022. PMID: 35083129 Free PMC article.
-
Infectious bursal disease virus in poultry: current status and future prospects.Vet Med (Auckl). 2016 Jan 19;7:9-18. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S68905. eCollection 2016. Vet Med (Auckl). 2016. PMID: 30050833 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Establishment of minigenomes for infectious bursal disease virus.Vet Res. 2024 Dec 18;55(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13567-024-01423-6. Vet Res. 2024. PMID: 39695895 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical