Multicenter study of unicompartmental knee revision. PCA, Marmor, and St Georg compared in 3,777 cases of arthrosis
- PMID: 1609585
- DOI: 10.3109/17453679209154777
Multicenter study of unicompartmental knee revision. PCA, Marmor, and St Georg compared in 3,777 cases of arthrosis
Abstract
The prospective Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Project contained 772 PCA, 1564 Marmor and 1441 St Georg unicompartment prostheses, implanted for gonarthrosis during the period December 1983-July 1990. Follow-up was performed in September 1991. There was a significant difference in the cumulative revision rate after only 2 years, increasing to 15 percent for the PCA, compared with 5-7 percent for the two other types. The difference between PCA and Marmor/St Georg was loosening of the femoral component. Major polyethylene wear was noted in a quarter of the revised PCA tibial components. The wear pattern of Marmor/St Georg was not analyzed in this study.
Similar articles
-
Polyethylene wear in unicondylar knee prostheses. 106 retrieved Marmor, PCA, and St Georg tibial components compared.Acta Orthop Scand. 1992 Jun;63(3):247-55. doi: 10.3109/17453679209154776. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992. PMID: 1609584
-
Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study.J Arthroplasty. 1995 Dec;10(6):722-31. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80066-x. J Arthroplasty. 1995. PMID: 8749752
-
[Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1995;81(6):505-13. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1995. PMID: 8560021 French.
-
Is an intact anterior cruciate ligament needed in order to have a well-functioning unicondylar knee replacement?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Nov;(428):170-3. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148895.78766.8a. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. PMID: 15534539 Review.
-
[Single-compartment "Lotus" type knee prosthesis in the treatment of lateralized gonarthrosis: results in 135 cases with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1993;79(7):565-76. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1993. PMID: 8085038 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Influence of Preservation of Normal Knee Contact Stress on Other Compartments with respect to the Tibial Insert Design for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.Appl Bionics Biomech. 2019 Nov 14;2019:9246379. doi: 10.1155/2019/9246379. eCollection 2019. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2019. PMID: 31827605 Free PMC article.
-
Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties.Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1273-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1915-4. Epub 2013 May 29. Int Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23715952 Free PMC article.
-
Common causes of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy one cases.Int Orthop. 2014 May;38(5):961-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2263-0. Epub 2014 Jan 9. Int Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24402555 Free PMC article.
-
Does bearing design influence midterm survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0975-7. Epub 2009 Jul 14. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 19597898 Free PMC article.
-
The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a review.Bone Joint Res. 2014 Jul;3(7):217-22. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000289. Bone Joint Res. 2014. PMID: 24986492 Free PMC article. Review.