Occult glove perforations: frequency during interventional radiologic procedures
- PMID: 1609687
- DOI: 10.2214/ajr.159.1.1609687
Occult glove perforations: frequency during interventional radiologic procedures
Abstract
Because the intact surgical glove is an important barrier against exposure to blood and other body fluids, occult glove perforations occurring during procedures may have implications for infection control and protection of health care workers. Although the frequency of occult glove perforations during surgery has been studied, no such data have been reported for interventional radiology. This study was designed to determine the frequency of occult glove perforations in interventional radiology. Gloves used during interventional radiologic procedures were collected and tested for occult perforations according to previously accepted methods. The frequency of occult defects in unused gloves was also determined. A form completed for each pair of gloves indicated length of use, awareness of perforations, and information about the procedure. The anatomic distribution of perforations was also studied. Occult perforations were found in 49 (10%) of 492 used gloves. The frequency of defects in unused gloves was 1% (2/160). Gloves worn fewer than 2 hr had a perforation rate of 7% (29/406), and those worn 2 hr or longer had a rate of 23% (20/86; p less than .0001). Perforations were noticed by the wearer in only three (6%) of the 49 perforations. The perforation rate for inner gloves of a double-glove set was 3% (1/34; the corresponding outer glove also was perforated). Although the 10% rate of occult glove perforation during interventional radiologic procedures found in this series is lower than rates described with surgical procedures, it is not insignificant. The significant increase in the rate of perforation when gloves are worn more than 2 hr suggests that gloves should routinely be changed at or before 2 hr of wear, particularly in procedures involving high-risk patients.
Comment in
-
Occult glove perforations.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Mar;160(3):666-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.3.8430586. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993. PMID: 8430586 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Glove perforations during interventional radiological procedures.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Apr;33(2):375-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9719-z. Epub 2009 Oct 1. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010. PMID: 19795166
-
Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Aug;30(4):319-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00201.x. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004. PMID: 15238110
-
[Glove perforation in surgery and protective effect of double gloves].Enferm Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;20(2):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2009.10.002. Epub 2010 Jan 29. Enferm Clin. 2010. PMID: 20116312 Clinical Trial. Spanish.
-
[Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):398-403. Gesundheitswesen. 1999. PMID: 10535220 Review. German.
-
[Defects in the surgical glove barrier. Single or double gloves].Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Mar 3;165(10):1016-9. Ugeskr Laeger. 2003. PMID: 12645406 Review. Danish.
Cited by
-
Risk factors and prevention of early infection after implantation or revision of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: results of a randomized study.Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Aug;43(8):1708-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1018819316633. Dig Dis Sci. 1998. PMID: 9724157 Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources