Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun;27(3):182-90.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-004-2270-8.

The frequency and potential causes of dispensing errors in a hospital pharmacy

Affiliations

The frequency and potential causes of dispensing errors in a hospital pharmacy

Adnan Beso et al. Pharm World Sci. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the frequency and types of dispensing errors identified both at the final check stage and outside of a UK hospital pharmacy, to explore the reasons why they occurred, and to make recommendations for their prevention.

Method: A definition of a dispensing error and a classification system were developed. To study the frequency and types of errors, pharmacy staff recorded details of all errors identified at the final check stage during a two-week period; all errors identified outside of the department and reported during a one-year period were also recorded. During a separate six-week period, pharmacy staff making dispensing errors identified at the final check stage were interviewed to explore the causes; the findings were analysed using a model of human error.

Main outcome measures: Percentage of dispensed items for which one or more dispensing errors were identified at the final check stage; percentage for which an error was reported outside of the pharmacy department; the active failures, error producing conditions and latent conditions that result in dispensing errors occurring.

Results: One or more dispensing errors were identified at the final check stage in 2.1% of 4849 dispensed items, and outside of the pharmacy department in 0.02% of 194,584 items. The majority of those identified at the final check stage involved slips in picking products, or mistakes in making assumptions about the products concerned. Factors contributing to the errors included labelling and storage of containers in the dispensary, interruptions and distractions, a culture where errors are seen as being inevitable, and reliance on others to identify and rectify errors.

Conclusion: Dispensing errors occur in about 2% of all dispensed items. About 1 in 100 of these is missed by the final check. The impact on dispensing errors of developments such as automated dispensing systems should be evaluated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Mar;47(3):555-71 - PubMed
    1. Pharm World Sci. 2002 Dec;24(6):217-23 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Aug;42(8):1724-32 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Feb 1;51(3):354-7 - PubMed
    1. Am Pharm. 1995 Dec;NS35(12):25-33 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources