Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;15(5):407-21.
doi: 10.1002/pon.963.

Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long-term survivors

Brad J Zebrack  1 , Patricia A Ganz, Coen A Bernaards, Laura Petersen, Laura Abraham
Affiliations

Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long-term survivors

Brad J Zebrack et al. Psychooncology. 2006 May.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a new instrument that measures aspects of long-term survivorship not measured by existing tools.

Methods: In qualitative interviews, 47 long-term cancer survivors (LTS) detailed ways that cancer has impacted their lives. Content analysis resulted in the creation of 325 candidate items for inclusion in a new Impact of Cancer (IOC) instrument. Following expert review, item reduction and pilot testing, 81 items were administered with other established health status and quality of life (QOL) instruments to 193 LTS of breast, prostate, colorectal cancers and lymphoma. Internal consistency reliability and validity of newly-derived scales was assessed.

Results: Factor analysis of items using a priori QOL domains resulted in the derivation of ten new and specific subscales: Health Awareness, Body Changes, Health Worries, Positive and Negative Self-Evaluation, Positive and Negative Life Outlook, Social Life Interferences, Relationships, and Meaning of Cancer. Internal consistency measurements for these subscales ranged from 0.67 to 0.89. Expected associations within and among the IOC subscales and standardized measures of health status and QOL were observed, as were some unexpected findings.

Conclusions: Psychometric analysis indicated that this initial version of the Impact of Cancer instrument measures distinct and relevant constructs for LTS. Future work is necessary to confirm the factor structure, responsiveness and further validation of the instrument.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993;85:365–376. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2004. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2005.
    1. Andrykowski M, Brady MJ, Hunt JW. Positive psychosocial adjustment in potential bone marrow transplant recipients: Cancer as a psychosocial transition. Psycho-Oncology. 1993;2:261–276.
    1. Bellizzi KM. Expressions of generativity and posttraumatic growth in adult cancer survivors. International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 2004;58(4):267–287. - PubMed
    1. Burnand B, Kernan WN, Feinstein AR. Indexes and boundaries for “quantitative significance” in statistical decisions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1990;43:1273–1284. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources